Publication:
Mechanical and thermal thresholds before and after application of a conditioning stimulus in healthy Göttingen Minipigs.

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0003-0768-7514
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0003-4179-8891
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidda1ec3c2-6258-4a45-b88a-8654aaf9b785
cris.virtualsource.author-orcide367785a-761a-4bb7-a8ff-1ec485ce6542
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid6eb58dfd-9fde-4638-ad45-a6946d31d2e0
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid7c8fff16-27b2-4f1c-993f-b68de149c0c2
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorPetrucci, Mariafrancesca
dc.contributor.authorSpadavecchia, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorRieben, Robert
dc.contributor.authorCasoni, Daniela
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-08T10:55:22Z
dc.date.available2024-10-08T10:55:22Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractMinipigs are widely used in biomedical research for translational studies. However, information about pain elicited by experimental procedures is lacking. Non-invasive methods as quantitative sensory testing and conditioned pain modulation are particularly attractive. Our overarching aim was to explore and refine these methods for assessing post-operative pain in minipigs after myocardial infarction. As first step, we aimed at defining mechanical and thermal thresholds in healthy adults Göttingen Minipigs, evaluating their reliability, and testing their modifications after the application of a conditioning stimulus. Thresholds were assessed at different body sites before and after a painful conditioning stimulus (CS) (cuffed tourniquet) and sham CS (uncuffed tourniquet) in eleven animals. Thresholds' reliability was assessed using interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The effect of the CS was assessed calculating absolute change, percentage change of the thresholds and standard error of measurement. Baseline mechanical thresholds (Newton) were: left hindlimb 81 [73; 81]; left forearm 81 [72.1; 81]; right forearm 81 [76; 81]; left chest 80.5 [68; 81]; right chest 81 [76.5; 81]; left neck 81 [70.3; 81]; right neck 74.8 [62.3; 80.5]. Reliability of mechanical thresholds was good at right chest (ICC = 0.835) and moderate at left chest (ICC = 0.591), left hindlimb (ICC = 0.606) and left neck (ICC = 0.518). Thermal thresholds showed poor reliability in all the tested sites. A modulatory effect was present at right chest, but it was seen when both a painful CS and a sham CS was applied. Minipigs tendentially showed a pro-nociceptive profile (i.e. conditioning pain facilitation). The measured thresholds are a reference for future trials in this species. Mechanical thresholds showed to be more reliable and, therefore, more useful, than thermal ones. The pain facilitation might be explained by the phenomenon of stress induced hyperalgesia, but this finding needs to be further investigated with a stricter paradigm.
dc.description.noteVerknüpfung M. Petrucci mit DBMR fehlt noch / 08.10.2024/mbr
dc.description.numberOfPages23
dc.description.sponsorshipExperimental Animal Center, Experimental Surgery Facility
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Anaesthesiology
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment for BioMedical Research (DBMR)
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Medicine
dc.description.sponsorshipGraduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences (GCB)
dc.identifier.doi10.48620/8419
dc.identifier.pmid39208203
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1371/journal.pone.0309604
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/44722
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS ONE
dc.relation.issn1932-6203
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::630 - Agriculture
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleMechanical and thermal thresholds before and after application of a conditioning stimulus in healthy Göttingen Minipigs.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.issue8
oaire.citation.volume19
oairecerif.author.affiliationExperimental Animal Center, Experimental Surgery Facility
oairecerif.author.affiliationDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Anaesthesiology
oairecerif.author.affiliationDepartment for BioMedical Research (DBMR)
oairecerif.author.affiliationExperimental Animal Center, Experimental Surgery Facility
oairecerif.author.affiliation2Department for BioMedical Research, Gruppe Rieben
oairecerif.author.affiliation2Department for BioMedical Research, Gruppe Rieben
unibe.additional.sponsorshipDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Medicine
unibe.additional.sponsorshipGraduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences (GCB)
unibe.contributor.rolecorresponding author
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.refereetrue
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
journal.pone.0309604.pdf
Size:
1.15 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Content:
published

Collections