Publication:
Impact through participatory research approaches: an archetype analysis

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0003-2813-7327
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0001-5368-8169
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidff2ee8e9-fada-46df-8216-69c99d93ba56
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid4cf9355e-7794-4af1-b43f-df67ffb58197
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid48d05231-96e4-4cfa-8e25-629f69daa10d
dc.contributor.authorTribaldos, Theresa Margarete
dc.contributor.authorOberlack, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Flurina
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-08T20:58:36Z
dc.date.available2025-01-08T20:58:36Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractParticipatory research approaches are often assumed to be effective for addressing sustainability problems that involve a substantial amount of complexity, uncertainty, and conflicting values. The adaptive and integrative character of these approaches engages various scientific and nonscientific actors in collective knowledge production processes. An increasing number of case studies documents pathways to impact triggered by participatory research approaches. However, cumulative learning across cases about the impacts of participatory research projects remains limited to date. One question is of particular interest, namely how and when different intensities of actor interactions in participatory research effectively contribute to advancing sustainable development.In this paper we address this knowledge gap by presenting a meta-analysis of 29 case studies of participatory research projects in agricultural settings. The study protocol follows systematic case retrieval and selection, coding, and data analysis through formal concept analysis. We introduce and utilize a new diagnostic framework to analyze the links between the intensity of actor interactions,sustainability impact goals, context conditions, and sustainability impacts. The results show that three archetypical patterns describe how the 29 case studies report that participatory research projects generate sustainability impacts: learning, knowledge products, and real-world transformations. Impact in all three patterns is consistently associated with higher intensities of interactions, i.e., coproduction and less consultation but not mere information. The most frequently reported impact is learning in a context of resources and environment problems. In this configuration, coproduction of knowledge is mainly used during the second research phase. However,the results also show that coproduction in the final phase of a participatory research project is more often used to achieve the impact of real-world transformations, which presumably involves more complexity and contestation than other impacts. We conclude that participatory research projects, which aim at transformative impacts in complex settings beyond knowledge products and learning,need to sustain high intensities of actor interactions in knowledge coproduction throughout all research phases to achieve their sustainability impact goals.
dc.description.numberOfPages25
dc.description.sponsorshipCentre for Development and Environment (CDE)
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.146190
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.5751/ES-11517-250315
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/201241
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherResilience Alliance Publications
dc.relation.ispartofEcology and Society
dc.relation.issn1708-3087
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C0F6E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C0F6E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C199E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C3D8E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.project
dc.relation.project
dc.relation.urlhttps://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/143138
dc.subjectarchetype analysis
dc.subjectarchetypical configurations
dc.subjectdiagnostic framework
dc.subjectparticipatory research approaches
dc.subjectsustainability problems
dc.subject.ddc900 - History::910 - Geography & travel
dc.titleImpact through participatory research approaches: an archetype analysis
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.volume25
oairecerif.author.affiliationCentre for Development and Environment (CDE)
oairecerif.author.affiliationCentre for Development and Environment (CDE)
oairecerif.author.affiliationCentre for Development and Environment (CDE)
oairecerif.author.affiliation2Geographisches Institut der Universität Bern (GIUB)
oairecerif.author.affiliation2Geographisches Institut der Universität Bern (GIUB)
oairecerif.author.affiliation2Geographisches Institut der Universität Bern (GIUB)
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2020-09-02 08:06:54
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId146190
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleE&S
unibe.refereedTRUE
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
ES-2020-11517.pdf
Size:
743.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Content:
published

Collections