• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Use of Enamel Matrix Derivative in Minimally Invasive/Flapless Approaches: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
 

Use of Enamel Matrix Derivative in Minimally Invasive/Flapless Approaches: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Options
  • Details
  • Files
BORIS DOI
10.48350/175438
Publisher DOI
10.3290/j.ohpd.b3125655
PubMed ID
35695693
Description
PURPOSE

The aim of the present systematic review with meta-analysis was to investigate the clinical effectiveness of EMD (enamel matrix derivative) using a minimally invasive surgical technique (MIST) or flapless approach for the treatment of severe periodontal probing depths.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the literature including searches in PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Grey Literature databases as well as manual searches was performed on September 1st, 2021. Studies utilising EMD in a non-surgical or minimally invasive approach were included. The eligibility criteria comprised randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing minimally-invasive/flapless approaches with/without EMD for the treatment of probing depths >5 mm.

RESULTS

From 1525 initial articles, 7 RCTs were included and 12 case series discussed. Three studies investigated a MIST approach, whereas 3 studies utilised a flapless approach. One study compared EMD with either a MIST or a flapless approach. The RCTs included ranged from 19-49 patients with at least 6 months of follow-up. While 5 of the studies included smokers, patients smoking >20 cigarettes/day were excluded from the study. The meta-analysis revealed that EMD with MIST improved recession coverage (REC) and bone fill (BF) when compared to MIST without EMD. However, no difference in CAL or PD was observed between MIST + EMD vs MIST without EMD. No statistically significant advantage was found for employing the EMD via the flapless approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing EMD in MIST procedures displayed statistically significant improvement in REC and BF when compared to MIST alone. These findings suggest that MIST in combination with EMD led to improved clinical outcomes while EMD employed in nonsurgical flapless therapy yielded no clinical benefits when compared to nonsurgical therapy alone without EMD. More research is needed to substantiate these findings.
Date of Publication
2022-06-13
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
Keyword(s)
EMD enamel matrix derivative enamel matrix proteins intrabony defect minimally invasive surgery
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Estrin, Nathan E
Moraschini, Vittorio
Zhang, Yufeng
Miron, Richard John
Zahnmedizinische Kliniken, Klinik für Parodontologie
Additional Credits
Zahnmedizinische Kliniken, Klinik für Parodontologie
Series
Oral health & preventive dentistry
Publisher
Quintessence
ISSN
1757-9996
Access(Rights)
open.access
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: dd892c [ 9.04. 8:30]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo