Publication:
Outcome study of real-time MR-guided cervical periradicular injection therapy in an open 1.0 Tesla MRI system

cris.virtualsource.author-orcidadcaf2bb-8b8a-4e5c-a542-e30366104b4b
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorMaurer, Martin
dc.contributor.authorDisch, Alexander C
dc.contributor.authorHartwig, Tony
dc.contributor.authorRenz, Diane M
dc.contributor.authorSchreiter, Nils
dc.contributor.authorHamm, B
dc.contributor.authorStreitparth, Florian
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-23T18:04:06Z
dc.date.available2024-10-23T18:04:06Z
dc.date.issued2014-06
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE To evaluate the accuracy, safety, and efficacy of cervical nerve root injection therapy using magnetic resonance guidance in an open 1.0 T MRI system. METHODS Between September 2009 and April 2012, a total of 21 patients (9 men, 12 women; mean age 47.1 ± 11.1 years) underwent MR-guided cervical periradicular injection for cervical radicular pain in an open 1.0 T system. An interactive proton density-weighted turbo spin echo (PDw TSE) sequence was used for real-time guidance of the MR-compatible 20-gauge injection needle. Clinical outcome was evaluated on a verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS) before injection therapy (baseline) and at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months during follow-up. RESULTS All procedures were technically successful and there were no major complications. The mean preinterventional VNRS score was 7.42 and exhibited a statistically significant decrease (P < 0.001) at all follow-up time points: 3.86 ± 1.53 at 1 week, 3.21 ± 2.19 at 1 month, 2.58 ± 2.54 at 3 months, and 2.76 ± 2.63 at 6 months. At 6 months, 14.3 % of the patients reported complete resolution of radicular pain and 38.1 % each had either significant (4-8 VNRS score points) or mild (1-3 VNRS score points) relief of pain; 9.5 % experienced no pain relief. CONCLUSION Magnetic resonance fluoroscopy-guided periradicular cervical spine injection is an accurate, safe, and efficacious treatment option for patients with cervical radicular pain. The technique may be a promising alternative to fluoroscopy- or CT-guided injections of the cervical spine, especially in young patients and in patients requiring repeat injections.
dc.description.numberOfPages7
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversitätsinstitut für Diagnostische, Interventionelle und Pädiatrische Radiologie
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.66105
dc.identifier.pmid24045999
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1007/s00270-013-0738-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/131441
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofCardiovascular and interventional radiology
dc.relation.issn0174-1551
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BB1CE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleOutcome study of real-time MR-guided cervical periradicular injection therapy in an open 1.0 Tesla MRI system
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.endPage762
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.startPage756
oaire.citation.volume37
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsinstitut für Diagnostische, Interventionelle und Pädiatrische Radiologie
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId66105
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleCARDIOVASC INTER RAD
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
art%3A10.1007%2Fs00270-013-0738-4.pdf
Size:
445.26 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
publisher
Content:
published

Collections