2025 Delphi consensus on robotic ventral mesh rectopexy.
Options
BORIS DOI
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
41099852
Description
Purpose
Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy (RVMR) has emerged as an effective technique for addressing rectal prolapse (RP) and associated pelvic floor disorders. However, variability persists regarding preoperative evaluation, patient selection, and procedural techniques. This Delphi consensus aims to provide evidence-based recommendations to standardize practice, enhance patient outcomes, and address key gaps in the literature.
Methods
Thirty-three experts in RVMR participated in a structured Delphi process. The panel addressed 10 key clinical questions, covering preoperative workup, surgical indications, procedural steps, learning curves, training, and RVMR outcomes. The consensus process was reached through iterative surveys, literature reviews, and a rigorous voting methodology, applying the GRADE approach.
Results
A total of 27 consensus statements were formulated, providing standardized recommendations on patient selection, imaging modalities, surgical technique, and expected clinical outcomes. Concerning surgical technique, the panel addressed variations in trocar placement, robotic instrument selection, and docking strategies. Additionally, consensus statements addressed the role of mesh reinforcement, fixation techniques, and the potential for combined procedures in the treatment of multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse. Of the 27 consensus statements, 3 (11.1%) were supported by moderate-quality evidence, whereas 18 (66.7%) were based on low or very-low-quality evidence and 6 (22.2%) on expert opinion.
Conclusion
This consensus provides a structured, consensus-based framework for clinicians and surgeons trying to address the complexities of RVMR and promote standardization and quality improvement in RP management, while acknowledging that the underlying evidence remains largely low-quality.
Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy (RVMR) has emerged as an effective technique for addressing rectal prolapse (RP) and associated pelvic floor disorders. However, variability persists regarding preoperative evaluation, patient selection, and procedural techniques. This Delphi consensus aims to provide evidence-based recommendations to standardize practice, enhance patient outcomes, and address key gaps in the literature.
Methods
Thirty-three experts in RVMR participated in a structured Delphi process. The panel addressed 10 key clinical questions, covering preoperative workup, surgical indications, procedural steps, learning curves, training, and RVMR outcomes. The consensus process was reached through iterative surveys, literature reviews, and a rigorous voting methodology, applying the GRADE approach.
Results
A total of 27 consensus statements were formulated, providing standardized recommendations on patient selection, imaging modalities, surgical technique, and expected clinical outcomes. Concerning surgical technique, the panel addressed variations in trocar placement, robotic instrument selection, and docking strategies. Additionally, consensus statements addressed the role of mesh reinforcement, fixation techniques, and the potential for combined procedures in the treatment of multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse. Of the 27 consensus statements, 3 (11.1%) were supported by moderate-quality evidence, whereas 18 (66.7%) were based on low or very-low-quality evidence and 6 (22.2%) on expert opinion.
Conclusion
This consensus provides a structured, consensus-based framework for clinicians and surgeons trying to address the complexities of RVMR and promote standardization and quality improvement in RP management, while acknowledging that the underlying evidence remains largely low-quality.
Date of Publication
2025-10-16
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
Keyword(s)
Minimally invasive surgery
•
Posterior pelvic floor disorders
•
Rectal prolapse
•
Robotic surgery
•
Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Schena, Carlo Alberto | |
Ascanelli, Simona | |
Grossi, Ugo | |
Gallo, Gaetano | |
Marchegiani, Francesco | |
Martínez-Pérez, Aleix | |
Pavone, Gaetano | |
Azzolina, Danila | |
Bianchi, Paolo Pietro | |
Bislenghi, Gabriele | |
Braini, Andrea | |
Carra, Maria Clotilde | |
Celentano, Valerio | |
Coratti, Andrea | |
Da Pozzo, Francesca | |
De Nardi, Paola | |
De Simone, Veronica | |
D'Hoore, André | |
Espin-Basany, Eloy | |
Genovese, Alfredo | |
Khan, Jim | |
Lenisa, Leonardo | |
Martellucci, Jacopo | |
Martinello, Ruby | |
Masetti, Michele | |
Milone, Marco | |
Naldini, Gabriele | |
Pellino, Gianluca | |
Sileri, Pierpaolo | |
Stuto, Angelo | |
Talento, Pasquale | |
Testini, Mario | |
Tonsi, Alfredo | |
Ratto, Carlo | |
de'Angelis, Nicola |
Additional Credits
Series
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Publisher
Springer
ISSN
1432-1262
0179-1958
Access(Rights)
open.access