• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. 2025 Delphi consensus on robotic ventral mesh rectopexy.
 

2025 Delphi consensus on robotic ventral mesh rectopexy.

Options
  • Details
  • Files
BORIS DOI
10.48620/91991
Publisher DOI
10.1007/s00384-025-05003-8
PubMed ID
41099852
Description
Purpose
Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy (RVMR) has emerged as an effective technique for addressing rectal prolapse (RP) and associated pelvic floor disorders. However, variability persists regarding preoperative evaluation, patient selection, and procedural techniques. This Delphi consensus aims to provide evidence-based recommendations to standardize practice, enhance patient outcomes, and address key gaps in the literature.
Methods
Thirty-three experts in RVMR participated in a structured Delphi process. The panel addressed 10 key clinical questions, covering preoperative workup, surgical indications, procedural steps, learning curves, training, and RVMR outcomes. The consensus process was reached through iterative surveys, literature reviews, and a rigorous voting methodology, applying the GRADE approach.
Results
A total of 27 consensus statements were formulated, providing standardized recommendations on patient selection, imaging modalities, surgical technique, and expected clinical outcomes. Concerning surgical technique, the panel addressed variations in trocar placement, robotic instrument selection, and docking strategies. Additionally, consensus statements addressed the role of mesh reinforcement, fixation techniques, and the potential for combined procedures in the treatment of multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse. Of the 27 consensus statements, 3 (11.1%) were supported by moderate-quality evidence, whereas 18 (66.7%) were based on low or very-low-quality evidence and 6 (22.2%) on expert opinion.
Conclusion
This consensus provides a structured, consensus-based framework for clinicians and surgeons trying to address the complexities of RVMR and promote standardization and quality improvement in RP management, while acknowledging that the underlying evidence remains largely low-quality.
Date of Publication
2025-10-16
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
Keyword(s)
Minimally invasive surgery
•
Posterior pelvic floor disorders
•
Rectal prolapse
•
Robotic surgery
•
Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Schena, Carlo Alberto
Ascanelli, Simona
Grossi, Ugo
Gallo, Gaetano
Marchegiani, Francesco
Martínez-Pérez, Aleix
Pavone, Gaetano
Azzolina, Danila
Adamina, Michel
Clinic of Visceral Surgery and Medicine
Bianchi, Paolo Pietro
Bislenghi, Gabriele
Braini, Andrea
Carra, Maria Clotilde
Celentano, Valerio
Coratti, Andrea
Da Pozzo, Francesca
De Nardi, Paola
De Simone, Veronica
D'Hoore, André
Espin-Basany, Eloy
Genovese, Alfredo
Khan, Jim
Lenisa, Leonardo
Martellucci, Jacopo
Martinello, Ruby
Masetti, Michele
Milone, Marco
Naldini, Gabriele
Pellino, Gianluca
Sileri, Pierpaolo
Stuto, Angelo
Talento, Pasquale
Testini, Mario
Tonsi, Alfredo
Ratto, Carlo
de'Angelis, Nicola
Additional Credits
Clinic of Visceral Surgery and Medicine
Series
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Publisher
Springer
ISSN
1432-1262
0179-1958
Access(Rights)
open.access
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: dd892c [ 9.04. 8:30]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo