Publication:
More adaptive versus less maladaptive coping: What is more predictive of symptom severity? Development of a new scale to investigate coping profiles across different psychopathological syndromes

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-2432-7791
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid3e2dea22-8da4-4a83-b144-2af2c6f2bea3
datacite.rightsrestricted
dc.contributor.authorMoritz, Steffen
dc.contributor.authorJahns, Anna Katharina
dc.contributor.authorSchröder, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorBerger, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorLincoln, Tania M.
dc.contributor.authorKlein, Jan Philipp
dc.contributor.authorGöritz, Anja S.
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-24T17:08:24Z
dc.date.available2024-10-24T17:08:24Z
dc.date.issued2016-02
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Lack of adaptive and enhanced maladaptive coping with stress and negative emotions are implicated in many psychopathological disorders. We describe the development of a new scale to investigate the relative contribution of different coping styles to psychopathology in a large population sample. We hypothesized that the magnitude of the supposed positive correlation between maladaptive coping and psychopathology would be stronger than the supposed negative correlation between adaptive coping and psychopathology. We also examined whether distinct coping style patterns emerge for different psychopathological syndromes. METHODS: A total of 2200 individuals from the general population participated in an online survey. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory revised (OCI-R) and the Paranoia Checklist were administered along with a novel instrument called Maladaptive and Adaptive Coping Styles (MAX) questionnaire. Participants were reassessed six months later. RESULTS: MAX consists of three dimensions representing adaptive coping, maladaptive coping and avoidance. Across all psychopathological syndromes, similar response patterns emerged. Maladaptive coping was more strongly related to psychopathology than adaptive coping both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. The overall number of coping styles adopted by an individual predicted greater psychopathology. Mediation analysis suggests that a mild positive relationship between adaptive and certain maladaptive styles (emotional suppression) partially accounts for the attenuated relationship between adaptive coping and depressive symptoms. LIMITATIONS: Results should be replicated in a clinical population. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that maladaptive and adaptive coping styles are not reciprocal. Reducing maladaptive coping seems to be more important for outcome than enhancing adaptive coping. The study supports transdiagnostic approaches advocating that maladaptive coping is a common factor across different psychopathologies.
dc.description.numberOfPages8
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitut für Psychologie, Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.80694
dc.identifier.pmid26702520
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.027
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/141084
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Affective Disorders
dc.relation.issn0165-0327
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BA84E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BD4DE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subject.ddc100 - Philosophy::150 - Psychology
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleMore adaptive versus less maladaptive coping: What is more predictive of symptom severity? Development of a new scale to investigate coping profiles across different psychopathological syndromes
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.endPage307
oaire.citation.startPage300
oaire.citation.volume191
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Psychologie, Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId80694
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleJ AFFECT DISORDERS
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
1-s2.0-S0165032715306960-main.pdf
Size:
408.87 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
publisher
Content:
published

Collections