The European baseline series in 10 European Countries, 2005/2006--results of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA)
Options
Date of Publication
2009
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute
Author
Uter, Wolfgang | |
Rämsch, Christiane | |
Aberer, Werner | |
Ayala, Fabio | |
Balato, Anna | |
Beliauskiene, Aiste | |
Fortina, Anna Belloni | |
Bircher, Andreas | |
Brasch, Jochen | |
Chowdhury, Mahbub M U | |
Coenraads, Pieter-Jan | |
Schuttelaar, Marie-Louise | |
Cooper, Sue | |
Corradin, Maria Teresa | |
Elsner, Peter | |
English, John S C | |
Fartasch, Manigè | |
Mahler, Vera | |
Frosch, Peter J | |
Fuchs, Thomas | |
Gawkrodger, David J | |
Gimènez-Arnau, Ana-Maria | |
Green, Cathy M | |
Horne, Helen L | |
Jolanki, Riitta | |
King, Codagh M | |
Krêcisz, Beata | |
Kiec-Swierczynska, Marta | |
Ormerod, Anthony D | |
Orton, David I | |
Peserico, Andrea | |
Rantanen, Tapio | |
Rustemeyer, Thomas | |
Sansom, Jane E | |
Universitätsklinik für Dermatologie | |
Statham, Barry N | |
Wilkinson, Mark | |
Schnuch, Axel |
Series
Contact dermatitis
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
0105-1873
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
Language
English
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
19659962
Description
BACKGROUND: Continual surveillance based on patch test results has proved useful for the identification of contact allergy. OBJECTIVES: To provide a current view on the spectrum of contact allergy to important sensitizers across Europe. PATIENTS/METHODS: Clinical and patch test data of 19 793 patients patch tested in 2005/2006 in the 31 participating departments from 10 European countries (the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies' (ESSCA) www.essca-dc.org) were descriptively analysed, aggregated to four European regions. RESULTS: Nickel sulfate remains the most common allergen with standardized prevalences ranging from 19.7% (central Europe) to 24.4% (southern Europe). While a number of allergens shows limited variation across the four regions, such as Myroxylon pereirae (5.3-6.8%), cobalt chloride (6.2-8.8%) or thiuram mix (1.7-2.4%), the differences observed with other allergens may hint on underlying differences in exposures, for example: dichromate 2.4% in the UK (west) versus 4.5-5.9% in the remaining EU regions, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone 4.1% in the South versus 2.1-2.7% in the remaining regions. CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding residual methodological variation (affecting at least some 'difficult' allergens) tackled by ongoing efforts for standardization, a comparative analysis as presented provides (i) a broad overview on contact allergy frequencies and (ii) interesting starting points for further, in-depth investigation.