• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Strategies for Antithrombotic Management During Non-cardiac Arterial Procedures: Results of the International ACTION Survey.
 

Strategies for Antithrombotic Management During Non-cardiac Arterial Procedures: Results of the International ACTION Survey.

Options
  • Details
  • Files
Description
European Vascular Research Collaborative: Christian Zielasek
BORIS DOI
10.48620/94661
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2025.01.005
PubMed ID
40678400
Description
Objective
Peri-procedural antithrombotics are used extensively to prevent thromboembolic complications during non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP) worldwide. However, there is a lack of evidence to support recommendations on antithrombotic strategies, possibly leading to substantial variation in local practices. A comprehensive overview of antithrombotic strategies is needed to identify the most widely accepted protocols employed during NCAP, highlight variations in local practices, and identify new research targets to establish evidence based peri-procedural anticoagulation management.Methods
An international, web based survey study was conducted from March to October 2023, targeting vascular clinical specialists who applied antithrombotic strategies during NCAP in daily practice.Results
The survey was completed by 436 vascular clinical specialists from 45 countries (Europeans: 93%, vascular surgeons or vascular surgery residents: 98%). Systemic unfractionated heparin was used by nearly all vascular specialists during all procedures (varying between 98-99%, depending on the procedure type), but could vary depending on specific NCAP. A fixed starting dose (39-52%, most often 5 000 IU [80-89%]) or an actual bodyweight dependent dose (42-52%, most commonly 100 IU/kg [40-67%] or 50 IU/kg [17-40%]) was mainly used. Except during fenestrated or branched endovascular aneurysm repair procedures (51%), activated clotting time (ACT) was employed by a minority (26-31%). A large variety in measurement protocols was observed, yet a target ACT of 200 seconds was most often used for all NCAP types (44-54%). Most vascular specialists considered a heparin follow up dose (61-81%) and heparin reversal using protamine (54-63%), both for a variety of indications. Of the participants, 68% expressed discontent with their current antithrombotic protocol(s).Conclusion
This comprehensive, international survey study revealed large variation among vascular clinical specialists' heparinisation strategies during NCAP. Together with the considerable discontent expressed regarding protocols, this emphasises the urgent need for comparative, randomised studies on antithrombotic management during NCAP.
Date of Publication
2025
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
Keyword(s)
Activated clotting time
•
Antithrombotic strategies
•
Heparin
•
Non-cardiac arterial procedures
•
Protamine
•
Vascular surgery
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Hoebink, Max
Jongkind, Vincent
Additional Credits
Clinic of Vascular Surgery
Series
EJVES vascular forum
Publisher
Elsevier
ISSN
2666-688X
Access(Rights)
open.access
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: dd892c [ 9.04. 8:30]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo