Comparison between a Flash Glucose Monitoring System and a Portable Blood Glucose Meter for Monitoring of Cats with Diabetic Ketosis or Ketoacidosis
Options
BORIS DOI
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
39409736
Description
Cats with diabetic ketosis or ketoacidosis DK(A) require intensive glucose monitoring. The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between a portable blood glucose meter (PBGM) and a flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS; FreeStyle Libre 2.0 Abbott®) measuring interstitial glucose in cats with DK(A). Ten client-owned cats with naturally occurring DK(A) were prospectively enrolled. Glucose concentrations were assessed with both methods every 1–3 h until resolution of DK(A), and every 4–8 h thereafter. While the median FGMS measured glucose concentration (14.3 mmol/L) was significantly lower than the median PBGM measured glucose concentration (19 mmol/L) (p < 0.001), the overall correlation between the FGMS and PBGM was high (r = 0.88; p < 0.001). In the Parkes error grid analysis, 98.3% of measurements fell in zones A and B. Bland–Altman plot analysis demonstrated that in the low glycaemic range (BG < 5.5 mmol/L), 50% of FGMS measurements deviated more than ±0.83 mmol/L, and in the high glycaemic range (BG ≥ 5.5 mmol/L), 81% of results deviated ≥15% from the PBGM measurements. There was significant inter-individual variation in the difference between glucose concentrations measured by the FGMS and PBGM (p < 0.001). In spite of being more easily tolerated and easier to use, currently this method cannot be recommended for routine monitoring of cats with DK(A).
Date of Publication
2024-09-26
Publication Type
Article
Keyword(s)
AlphaTRAK 2
•
FreeStyle Libre 2.0
•
feline diabetes
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Katarina Hazuchova | |
Series
Animals
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (Switzerland)
ISSN
2076-2615
Related Funding(s)
Access(Rights)
open.access