Publication:
Caesarean sections and for-profit status of hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis.

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0003-4499-6658
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidab8a60fe-3025-4836-8078-68cb9ef64af5
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid7f7085be-e822-4de1-8908-5c5ace223fcb
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidab8f4140-ea53-4b2f-9325-925f221b3927
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid30ed7e6c-e888-4650-aacc-d4ab36e47d24
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid717d493b-96db-4872-8921-e96206509da3
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorHoxha, Ilir
dc.contributor.authorSyrogiannouli, Lamprini
dc.contributor.authorLuta, Xhyljeta
dc.contributor.authorTal, Kali
dc.contributor.authorGoodman, David C
dc.contributor.authorDa Costa, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorJüni, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-25T05:14:22Z
dc.date.available2024-10-25T05:14:22Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-17
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE Financial incentives may encourage private for-profit providers to perform more caesarean section (CS) than non-profit hospitals. We therefore sought to determine the association of for-profit status of hospital and odds of CS. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from the first year of records through February 2016. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA To be eligible, studies had to report data to allow the calculation of ORs of CS comparing private for-profit hospitals with public or private non-profit hospitals in a specific geographic area. OUTCOMES The prespecified primary outcome was the adjusted OR of births delivered by CS in private for-profit hospitals as compared with public or private non-profit hospitals; the prespecified secondary outcome was the crude OR of CS in private for-profit hospitals as compared with public or private non-profit hospitals. RESULTS 15 articles describing 17 separate studies in 4.1 million women were included. In a meta-analysis of 11 studies, the adjusted odds of delivery by CS was 1.41 higher in for-profit hospitals as compared with non-profit hospitals (95% CI 1.24 to 1.60) with no relevant heterogeneity between studies (τ(2)≤0.037). Findings were robust across subgroups of studies in stratified analyses. The meta-analysis of crude estimates from 16 studies revealed a somewhat more pronounced association (pooled OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.27) with moderate-to-high heterogeneity between studies (τ(2)≥0.179). CONCLUSIONS CS are more likely to be performed by for-profit hospitals as compared with non-profit hospitals. This holds true regardless of women's risk and contextual factors such as country, year or study design. Since financial incentives are likely to play an important role, we recommend examination of incentive structures of for-profit hospitals to identify strategies that encourage appropriate provision of CS.
dc.description.numberOfPages9
dc.description.sponsorshipBerner Institut für Hausarztmedizin (BIHAM)
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.96103
dc.identifier.pmid28213600
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013670
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/150184
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ open
dc.relation.issn2044-6055
dc.relation.organizationInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine
dc.relation.organizationInstitute of General Practice and Primary Care (BIHAM)
dc.relation.schoolGraduate School for Health Sciences (GHS)
dc.subjectcaesarean section
dc.subjectfinancial incentives
dc.subjectfor-profit hospital
dc.subjecthealth services
dc.subjectmedical practice variation
dc.subjectnon-profit hospital
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.subject.ddc300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology::360 - Social problems & social services
dc.titleCaesarean sections and for-profit status of hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.issue2
oaire.citation.startPagee013670
oaire.citation.volume7
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
oairecerif.author.affiliationBerner Institut für Hausarztmedizin (BIHAM)
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
oairecerif.author.affiliationBerner Institut für Hausarztmedizin (BIHAM)
oairecerif.author.affiliationBerner Institut für Hausarztmedizin (BIHAM)
oairecerif.author.affiliation2Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2017-09-09 17:51:25
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId96103
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleBMJ Open
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Name:
Hoxha BMJOpen 2017.pdf
Size:
1.17 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Content:
published
Name:
Hoxha BMJOpen 2017_supplmat.pdf
Size:
268.89 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Content:
supplemental

Collections