Publication:
Recombinant human BMP9 (RhBMP9) in comparison with rhBMP2 for ridge augmentation following tooth extraction: An experimental study in the Beagle dog.

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0003-3960-4920
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid24028ad6-2770-461c-bfc6-3bc61291f057
cris.virtualsource.author-orcida69924a4-d65b-4404-8a95-a2223709a37e
cris.virtualsource.author-orciddac32003-dcbc-45b1-9c1e-d95ad19c43ce
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid1393c5d0-5d9b-43a8-8954-60152d900db9
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid94cf4d7c-d716-4557-bc0b-99d950293fc7
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid9f252f02-c021-498e-b353-703790b6d890
datacite.rightsrestricted
dc.contributor.authorSaulacic, Nikola
dc.contributor.authorSchaller, Benoît
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorKobayashi, Masako
dc.contributor.authorKobayashi, Eizaburo
dc.contributor.authorLang, Niklaus Peter
dc.contributor.authorMiron, Richard John
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-07T17:01:19Z
dc.date.available2024-10-07T17:01:19Z
dc.date.issued2018-10
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of rhBMP2 with rhBMP9 on ridge augmentation following healing of extraction sockets in dogs. MATERIAL AND METHODS Five male Beagle dogs, approximately 12 months of age, were used. The mesial roots of the four maxillary premolars were endodontically treated. The distal roots were extracted, and the buccal bony walls removed. All extraction sockets were filled with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM). A collagen membrane was soaked with 4 μg or 20 μg of rhBMP9, 20 μg of rhBMP2 or sterile saline and placed over the augmented sites. All animals were euthanized after 8 weeks of healing and investigated by micro-CT and histologic analysis. A one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD post hoc test was used to compare the differences between the four groups. RESULTS New bone apposition in all defects was observed from the original bone. RhBMP samples showed an increase in bone formation in the buccal area and better integration of DBBM particles when compared to control sites. Both rhBMP9 defects showed higher values of bone (p = 0.024), bone marrow (p = 0.044), and total augmentation volume (p = 0.033) than the rhBMP2 (20 μg) or control sites. Highest bone area was found in rhBMP9 defects (p = 0.895). CONCLUSIONS Within the limitations of the present study, rhBMP9 sites demonstrated higher bone-inducing potential in combination with DBBM than rhBMP2. While rhBMP9s failed to demonstrate a clear dose-response relationship to the outcomes, future studies are necessary to evaluate the appropriate dose and carrier systems.
dc.description.numberOfPages10
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment for BioMedical Research, Forschungsgruppe Schädel-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversitätsklinik für Schädel-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
dc.description.sponsorshipEmeriti, Medizinische Fakultät
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.123934
dc.identifier.pmid30281171
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1111/clr.13371
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/62526
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relation.ispartofClinical oral implants research
dc.relation.issn0905-7161
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C1F8E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C54DE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subjectRhBMP extraction socket guided bone regeneration regeneration
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleRecombinant human BMP9 (RhBMP9) in comparison with rhBMP2 for ridge augmentation following tooth extraction: An experimental study in the Beagle dog.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.endPage1059
oaire.citation.issue10
oaire.citation.startPage1050
oaire.citation.volume29
oairecerif.author.affiliationDepartment for BioMedical Research, Forschungsgruppe Schädel-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Schädel-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
oairecerif.author.affiliationDepartment for BioMedical Research, Forschungsgruppe Schädel-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Schädel-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
oairecerif.author.affiliationEmeriti, Medizinische Fakultät
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Schädel-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
oairecerif.author.affiliation2Universitätsklinik für Schädel-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
oairecerif.author.affiliation2Department for BioMedical Research, Forschungsgruppe Schädel-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
oairecerif.author.affiliation2Universitätsklinik für Schädel-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
oairecerif.author.affiliation2Department for BioMedical Research, Forschungsgruppe Schädel-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
oairecerif.author.affiliation2Universitätsklinik für Schädel-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2019-12-15 23:19:36
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId123934
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleCLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Saulacic_et_al-2018-Clinical_Oral_Implants_Research.pdf
Size:
1.72 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
publisher
Content:
published

Collections