• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Comparison of bacterial plaque samples from titanium implant and tooth surfaces by different methods
 

Comparison of bacterial plaque samples from titanium implant and tooth surfaces by different methods

Options
  • Details
  • Files
BORIS DOI
10.7892/boris.20033
Publisher DOI
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01197.x
PubMed ID
16441779
Description
Studies have shown similarities in the microflora between titanium implants or tooth sites when samples are taken by gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) sampling methods. The purpose of the present study was to study the microflora from curette and GCF samples using the checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization method to assess the microflora of patients who had at least one oral osseo-integrated implant and who were otherwise dentate. Plaque samples were taken from tooth/implant surfaces and from sulcular gingival surfaces with curettes, and from gingival fluid using filter papers. A total of 28 subjects (11 females) were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the subjects was 64.1 years (SD+/-4.7). On average, the implants studied had been in function for 3.7 years (SD+/-2.9). The proportion of Streptococcus oralis (P<0.02) and Fusobacterium periodonticum (P<0.02) was significantly higher at tooth sites (curette samples). The GCF samples yielded higher proportions for 28/40 species studies (P-values varying between 0.05 and 0.001). The proportions of Tannerella forsythia (T. forsythensis), and Treponema denticola were both higher in GCF samples (P<0.02 and P<0.05, respectively) than in curette samples (implant sites). The microbial composition in gingival fluid from samples taken at implant sites differed partly from that of curette samples taken from implant surfaces or from sulcular soft tissues, providing higher counts for most bacteria studied at implant surfaces, but with the exception of Porphyromonas gingivalis. A combination of GCF and curette sampling methods might be the most representative sample method.
Date of Publication
2006
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Gerber, Jeanne
Zahnmedizinische Kliniken, Klinik für Parodontologie
Wenaweser, Doris
Heitz-Mayfield, Lisa
Zahnmedizinische Kliniken (ZMK)
Lang, Niklaus Peter
Zahnmedizinische Kliniken, Klinik für Parodontologie
Persson, Gösta Rutger
Zahnmedizinische Kliniken, Klinik für Parodontologie
Additional Credits
Zahnmedizinische Kliniken, Klinik für Parodontologie
Zahnmedizinische Kliniken (ZMK)
Series
Clinical oral implants research
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN
0905-7161
Access(Rights)
restricted
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: dd892c [ 9.04. 8:30]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo