• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Design and quality criteria for archetype analysis

Design and quality criteria for archetype analysis

Details
Files
DOI
10.7892/boris.132558
Publisher DOI
10.5751/ES-10855-240306
Abstract
A key challenge in addressing the global degradation of natural resources and the environment is to effectively transfer successful strategies across heterogeneous contexts. Archetype analysis is a particularly salient approach in this regard that helps researchers to understand and compare patterns of (un)sustainability in heterogeneous cases. Archetype analysis avoids traps of overgeneralization and ideography by identifying reappearing but nonuniversal patterns that hold for well-defined subsets of cases. It can be applied by researchers working in inter- or transdisciplinary settings to study sustainability issues from a broad range of theoretical and methodological standpoints. However, there is still an urgent need for quality standards to guide the design of theoretically rigorous and practically useful archetype analyses. To this end, we propose four quality criteria and corresponding research strategies to address them: (1) specify the domain of validity for each archetype, (2) ensure that archetypes can be combined to characterize single cases, (3) explicitly navigate levels of abstraction, and (4) obtain a fit between attribute configurations, theories, and empirical domains of validity. These criteria are based on a stocktaking of current methodological challenges in archetypes research, including: to demonstrate the validity of the analysis, delineate boundaries of archetypes, and select appropriate attributes to define them. We thus contribute to a better common understanding of the approach and to the improvement of the research design of future archetype analyses.
Date Issued
2019
Publication Type
Article
Subjects
abstraction
•
archetype analysis
•
generalization
•
ideographic trap
•
interdisciplinary collaboration
•
panacea
•
pattern
•
research
design
•
social-ecological systems
•
qualitative
•
quantitative
•
validity
Language(s)
en
Author(s)
Eisenack, Klaus
Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio
Epstein, Graham
Kimmich, Christian
Magliocca, Nicholas
Manuel-Navarrete, David
Oberlack, Christoph  
Geographisches Institut der Universität Bern (GIUB)  
Centre for Development and Environment (CDE)  
Roggero, Matteo
Sietz, Diana
Additional Credits
Centre for Development and Environment (CDE)  
Geographisches Institut der Universität Bern (GIUB)  
Journal
Ecology and Society
Publisher
Resilience Alliance Publications
ISSN
1708-3087
Project(s)
Archetypes of transnational land acquisitions  
Sustainability Governance  
Access(Rights)
open.access
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 0eaa7c [ 7.08. 11:06]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • BORIS Portal & Open Science
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo
Repository logo COAR Notify