Selection for biopsy of kidney transplant patients by diffusion-weighted MRI.
Options
BORIS DOI
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
28374076
Description
OBJECTIVES
To assess retrospectively whether diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) allows physicians to determine the severity of histopathologic findings in biopsies of renal allograft patients with deteriorating renal function.
METHODS
Forty consecutive kidney transplant patients underwent DW-MRI and biopsy. Patients were assigned to one group with severe and to another group with normal or mild histopathologic findings. These two groups were compared based on a qualitative DW-MRI assessment (homo-/heterogeneity) and the combination of qualitative and quantitative DW-MRI parameters (ADC, and intravoxel incoherent motion, IVIM, parameters: D, f, D*). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were determined for each parameter.
RESULTS
Biopsy findings were severe in 25 patients and normal or mild in 15 patients. Qualitative DW-MRI led to a sensitivity of 44.0% and a specificity of 93.3%. Combined qualitative and quantitative DW-MRI led to an accuracy of 80% for both the minimal ADC (ADCmin) and the minimal perfusion fraction (fmin) with a sensitivity of 84.0% and 92.0% and a specificity of 73.3% and 60.0%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Combined qualitative and quantitative DW-MRI might allow physicians to determine the severity of histopathologic findings in biopsies of a high number of kidney transplant patients.
KEY POINTS
• Qualitative DW-MRI is highly specific when predicting the severity of kidney transplant biopsy. • Allografts appearing heterogeneous on ADC are associated with severe histopathologic findings. • Combining qualitative and quantitative DW-MRI parameters improves the classification's sensitivity and accuracy. • Kidney transplant biopsies might be spared by combining qualitative and quantitative DW-MRI.
To assess retrospectively whether diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) allows physicians to determine the severity of histopathologic findings in biopsies of renal allograft patients with deteriorating renal function.
METHODS
Forty consecutive kidney transplant patients underwent DW-MRI and biopsy. Patients were assigned to one group with severe and to another group with normal or mild histopathologic findings. These two groups were compared based on a qualitative DW-MRI assessment (homo-/heterogeneity) and the combination of qualitative and quantitative DW-MRI parameters (ADC, and intravoxel incoherent motion, IVIM, parameters: D, f, D*). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were determined for each parameter.
RESULTS
Biopsy findings were severe in 25 patients and normal or mild in 15 patients. Qualitative DW-MRI led to a sensitivity of 44.0% and a specificity of 93.3%. Combined qualitative and quantitative DW-MRI led to an accuracy of 80% for both the minimal ADC (ADCmin) and the minimal perfusion fraction (fmin) with a sensitivity of 84.0% and 92.0% and a specificity of 73.3% and 60.0%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Combined qualitative and quantitative DW-MRI might allow physicians to determine the severity of histopathologic findings in biopsies of a high number of kidney transplant patients.
KEY POINTS
• Qualitative DW-MRI is highly specific when predicting the severity of kidney transplant biopsy. • Allografts appearing heterogeneous on ADC are associated with severe histopathologic findings. • Combining qualitative and quantitative DW-MRI parameters improves the classification's sensitivity and accuracy. • Kidney transplant biopsies might be spared by combining qualitative and quantitative DW-MRI.
Date of Publication
2017-10
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
Keyword(s)
Anatomy & histology Biopsy Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging Echo-planar imaging Renal transplant
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Kruse, Anja |
Series
European radiology
Publisher
Springer
ISSN
0938-7994
Access(Rights)
open.access