• LOGIN
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publication
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. The results of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning experiments are realistic
 

The results of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning experiments are realistic

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.7892/boris.146606
Date of Publication
November 2020
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Institut für Pflanzen...

Author
Jochum, Malte
Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften (IPS)
Fischer, Markus
Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften (IPS)
Isbell, Forest
Roscher, Christiane
van der Plas, Alfons Leendert Derk
Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften (IPS)
Boch, Steffen
Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften (IPS)
Boenisch, Gerhard
Buchmann, Nina
Catford, Jane A.
Cavender-Bares, Jeannine
Ebeling, Anne
Eisenhauer, Nico
Gleixner, Gerd
Hölzel, Norbert
Kattge, Jens
Klaus, Valentin H.
Kleinebecker, Till
Lange, Markus
Le Provost, Gaëtane
Meyer, Sebastian T.
Molina Venegas, Rafael
Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften (IPS)
Mommer, Liesje
Oelmann, Yvonne
Penone, Caterinaorcid-logo
Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften (IPS)
Prati, Daniel
Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften (IPS)
Reich, Peter B.
Rindisbacher, Abiel
Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften (IPS)
Schäfer, Deborah
Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften (IPS)
Scheu, Stefan
Schmid, Bernhard
Tilman, David
Tscharntke, Teja
Vogel, Anja
Wagg, Cameron
Weigelt, Alexandra
Weisser, Wolfgang W.
Wilcke, Wolfgang
Manning, Peter
Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften (IPS)
Subject(s)

500 - Science::580 - ...

Series
Nature ecology & evolution
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
2397-334X
Publisher
Springer Nature
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1038/s41559-020-1280-9
PubMed ID
32839545
Description
A large body of research shows that biodiversity loss can reduce ecosystem functioning. However, much of the evidence for this relationship is drawn from biodiversity–ecosystem functioning experiments in which biodiversity loss is simulated by randomly assembling communities of varying species diversity, and ecosystem functions are measured. This random assembly has led some ecologists to question the relevance of biodiversity experiments to real-world ecosystems, where community assembly or disassembly may be non-random and influenced by external drivers, such as climate, soil conditions or land use. Here, we compare data from real-world grassland plant communities with data from two of the largest and longest-running grassland biodiversity experiments (the Jena Experiment in Germany and BioDIV in the United States) in terms of their taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity and functional-trait composition. We found that plant communities of biodiversity experiments cover almost all of the multivariate variation of the real-world communities, while also containing community types that are not currently observed in the real world. Moreover, they have greater variance in their compositional features than their real-world counterparts. We then re-analysed a subset of experimental data that included only ecologically realistic communities (that is, those comparable to real-world communities). For 10 out of 12 biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships, biodiversity effects did not differ significantly between the full dataset of biodiversity experiments and the ecologically realistic subset of experimental communities. Although we do not provide direct evidence for strong or consistent biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships in real-world communities, our results demonstrate that the results of biodiversity experiments are largely insensitive to the exclusion of unrealistic communities and that the conclusions drawn from biodiversity experiments are generally robust.
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/37165
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
2020_NatEcolEvol_sub.pdfAdobe PDF21.64 MBsubmitted
2020_NatEcolEvol_4_1485.pdfAdobe PDF8.24 MBpublished restricted
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: b407eb [23.05. 15:47]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo