Publication:
Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-6772-6346
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid3360179c-9be9-473b-ac03-a22eb128643e
dc.contributor.authorSchätzle, Marc
dc.contributor.authorMännchen, Roland
dc.contributor.authorZwahlen, Marcel
dc.contributor.authorLang, Niklaus P
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-14T07:35:05Z
dc.date.available2024-10-14T07:35:05Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstractAIM: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on the survival rates of palatal implants, Onplants((R)), miniplates and mini screws. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic MEDLINE search supplemented by manual searching was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies on palatal implants, Onplants((R)), miniplates and miniscrews with a mean follow-up time of at least 12 weeks and of at least 10 units per modality having been examined clinically at a follow-up visit. Assessment of studies and data abstraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Reported failures of used devices were analyzed using random-effects Poisson regression models to obtain summary estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of failure and survival proportions. RESULTS: The search up to January 2009 provided 390 titles and 71 abstracts with full-text analysis of 34 articles, yielding 27 studies that met the inclusion criteria. In meta-analysis, the failure rate for Onplants((R)) was 17.2% (95% CI: 5.9-35.8%), 10.5% for palatal implants (95% CI: 6.1-18.1%), 16.4% for miniscrews (95% CI: 13.4-20.1%) and 7.3% for miniplates (95% CI: 5.4-9.9%). Miniplates and palatal implants, representing torque-resisting temporary anchorage devices (TADs), when grouped together, showed a 1.92-fold (95% CI: 1.06-2.78) lower clinical failure rate than miniscrews. CONCLUSION: Based on the available evidence in the literature, palatal implants and miniplates showed comparable survival rates of >or=90% over a period of at least 12 weeks, and yielded superior survival than miniscrews. Palatal implants and miniplates for temporary anchorage provide reliable absolute orthodontic anchorage. If the intended orthodontic treatment would require multiple miniscrew placement to provide adequate anchorage, the reliability of such systems is questionable. For patients who are undergoing extensive orthodontic treatment, force vectors may need to be varied or the roots of the teeth to be moved may need to slide past the anchors. In this context, palatal implants or miniplates should be the TADs of choice.
dc.description.numberOfPages9
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.30649
dc.identifier.isi000271629000008
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01754.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/104137
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.publisher.placeOxford
dc.relation.ispartofClinical oral implants research
dc.relation.issn0905-7161
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BECFE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.titleSurvival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.endPage9
oaire.citation.issue12
oaire.citation.startPage1351
oaire.citation.volume20
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2017-10-11 06:10:00
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId30649
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleCLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES
unibe.refereedTRUE
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Schätzle ClinOralImplRes 2009.pdf
Size:
243 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
publisher
Content:
published

Collections