• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Possible Diagnostic Error in Cervical Artery Dissection: Analysis of STOP-CAD Study.
 

Possible Diagnostic Error in Cervical Artery Dissection: Analysis of STOP-CAD Study.

Options
  • Details
  • Files
BORIS DOI
10.48620/98182
Publisher DOI
10.1161/JAHA.125.046408
PubMed ID
42132166
Description
Background
Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is a common cause of stroke in young adults but is frequently misdiagnosed due to its nonspecific symptoms. This study examines factors associated with possible diagnostic error in CeAD and evaluates its impact on patient outcomes.Methods
We conducted a secondary analysis of the STOP-CAD (Antithrombotic Therapy for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection) study, which is a multicenter international study of adult patients admitted with CeAD. Possible diagnostic error was defined as the presence of CeAD symptoms within 30 days before the index CeAD diagnosis. The comparison group included patients diagnosed on their first medical encounter. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors associated with possible diagnostic error. Primary and secondary outcomes included ischemic stroke, death, and modified Rankin Scale score <2.Results
Of 4012 patients (mean age 47.5 years, 44.6% female), 663 (16.5%) experienced possible diagnostic error. Among these, 224 (33.8%) reported to have ischemic stroke before CeAD diagnosis. Patients with possible diagnostic error were younger (odds ratio [OR], 0.89, P<0.001), more likely to have a history of migraines (OR, 1.35, P=0.007), and more likely to present with headaches (OR, 1.43, P<0.001), but less likely to show focal neurologic signs (OR, 0.68, P<0.001). There was no significant difference between groups in ischemic stroke after diagnosis (adjusted OR, 0.96, P=0.86), 90-day modified Rankin Scale score <2 (adjusted OR, 1.04, P=0.80), or death (adjusted OR, 0.58, P=0.34).Conclusions
One in 6 patients with CeAD experienced a possible diagnostic error, particularly those who were younger, had migraines, or presented with headaches and nonfocal symptoms.
Date of Publication
2026-05-19
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
Keyword(s)
dissection
•
misdiagnosis
•
stroke
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Bakradze, Ekaterina
Shu, Liqi
Yaghi, Shadi
Tran, Thanh Lam Ngoc
Crandal, Ross Curtiss
Lester, Evan
Mandel, Daniel M
Siegler, James Ernest
Penckofer, Mary
Liberman, Ava Leigh
Field, Thalia S
Khan, Farhan
Kam, Wayneho
Mac Grory, Brian
Saleh Velez, Faddi G
Henninger, Nils
Elangovan, Cheran
Krishnaiah, Balaji
Gandhi, Preet
Shahripour, Reza Bavarsad
Ghannam, Malik
Heldner, Mirjam Rachelorcid-logo
Antonenko, Kateryna
Clinic of Neurology
Rothstein, Aaron
Leker, Ronen R
Metanis, Issa
Samaniego, Edgar
Romoli, Michele
Zedde, Marialuisa
Pascarella, Rosario
Klein, Piers
Nguyen, Thanh N
Khasiyev, Farid
Khazaal, Ossama
Almajali, Mohammad
Zubair, Adeel S
Elnazeir, Marwa
Marto, João Pedro
Nehme, Ahmad
Giles, James Anthony
Engelter, Stefan T
Stretz, Christoph
Salehi Omran, Setareh
Additional Credits
Clinic of Neurology
Series
Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Publisher
Wiley
ISSN
2047-9980
Access(Rights)
open.access
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: dd892c [ 9.04. 8:30]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo