Publication:
Burden of cardiovascular disease across 29 countries and GPs' decision to treat hypertension in oldest-old.

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-3813-4616
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidd7590ac9-7872-44f9-8943-3571b0963df5
cris.virtualsource.author-orciddcf039b3-51b9-457e-aa4f-439d935925b3
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorStreit, Sven
dc.contributor.authorGussekloo, Jacobijn
dc.contributor.authorBurman, Robert A
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Claire
dc.contributor.authorKitanovska, Biljana Gerasimovska
dc.contributor.authorGintere, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorGómez Bravo, Raquel
dc.contributor.authorHoffmann, Kathryn
dc.contributor.authorIftode, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, Kasper L
dc.contributor.authorKerse, Ngaire
dc.contributor.authorKoskela, Tuomas H
dc.contributor.authorPeštić, Sanda Kreitmayer
dc.contributor.authorKurpas, Donata
dc.contributor.authorMallen, Christian D
dc.contributor.authorMaisonneuve, Hubert
dc.contributor.authorMerlo, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorMueller, Yolanda
dc.contributor.authorMuth, Christiane
dc.contributor.authorOrnelas, Rafael H
dc.contributor.authorŠter, Marija Petek
dc.contributor.authorPetrazzuoli, Ferdinando
dc.contributor.authorRosemann, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorSattler, Martin
dc.contributor.authorŠvadlenková, Zuzana
dc.contributor.authorTatsioni, Athina
dc.contributor.authorThulesius, Hans
dc.contributor.authorTkachenko, Victoria
dc.contributor.authorTorzsa, Peter
dc.contributor.authorTsopra, Rosy
dc.contributor.authorTuz, Canan
dc.contributor.authorVerschoor, Marjolein
dc.contributor.authorViegas, Rita P A
dc.contributor.authorVinker, Shlomo
dc.contributor.authorde Waal, Margot W M
dc.contributor.authorZeller, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorRodondi, Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorPoortvliet, Rosalinde K E
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-25T13:45:40Z
dc.date.available2024-10-25T13:45:40Z
dc.date.issued2018-03
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES We previously found large variations in general practitioner (GP) hypertension treatment probability in oldest-old (>80 years) between countries. We wanted to explore whether differences in country-specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden and life expectancy could explain the differences. DESIGN This is a survey study using case-vignettes of oldest-old patients with different comorbidities and blood pressure levels. An ecological multilevel model analysis was performed. SETTING GP respondents from European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN) countries, Brazil and New Zeeland. SUBJECTS This study included 2543 GPs from 29 countries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES GP treatment probability to start or not start antihypertensive treatment based on responses to case-vignettes; either low (<50% started treatment) or high (≥50% started treatment). CVD burden is defined as ratio of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost due to ischemic heart disease and/or stroke and total DALYs lost per country; life expectancy at age 60 and prevalence of oldest-old per country. RESULTS Of 1947 GPs (76%) responding to all vignettes, 787 (40%) scored high treatment probability and 1160 (60%) scored low. GPs in high CVD burden countries had higher odds of treatment probability (OR 3.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.00-4.57); in countries with low life expectancy at 60, CVD was associated with high treatment probability (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.12-4.25); but not in countries with high life expectancy (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.56-1.98). CONCLUSIONS GPs' choice to treat/not treat hypertension in oldest-old was explained by differences in country-specific health characteristics. GPs in countries with high CVD burden and low life expectancy at age 60 were most likely to treat hypertension in oldest-old. Key Points  • General practitioners (GPs) are in a clinical dilemma when deciding whether (or not) to treat hypertension in the oldest-old (>80 years of age).  • In this study including 1947 GPs from 29 countries, we found that a high country-specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden (i.e. myocardial infarction and/or stroke) was associated with a higher GP treatment probability in patients aged >80 years.  • However, the association was modified by country-specific life expectancy at age 60. While there was a positive association for GPs in countries with a low life expectancy at age 60, there was no association in countries with a high life expectancy at age 60.  • These findings help explaining some of the large variation seen in the decision as to whether or not to treat hypertension in the oldest-old.
dc.description.numberOfPages10
dc.description.sponsorshipBerner Institut für Hausarztmedizin (BIHAM)
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.110550
dc.identifier.pmid29366388
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1080/02813432.2018.1426142
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/157880
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
dc.relation.issn1502-7724
dc.relation.organizationClinic of General Internal Medicine
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BDB9E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subjectOldest-old cardiovascular disease burden clinical decision-making hypertension life expectancy
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.subject.ddc300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology::360 - Social problems & social services
dc.titleBurden of cardiovascular disease across 29 countries and GPs' decision to treat hypertension in oldest-old.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.endPage98
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage89
oaire.citation.volume36
oairecerif.author.affiliationBerner Institut für Hausarztmedizin (BIHAM)
oairecerif.author.affiliationBerner Institut für Hausarztmedizin (BIHAM)
oairecerif.author.affiliation2Clinic of General Internal Medicine
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2019-10-27 18:55:35
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId110550
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleSCAND J PRIM HEALTH CARE
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Streit ScandJPrimHealthCare 2018.pdf
Size:
1.32 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Content:
published

Collections