Publication:
Territorializing spatial data: Controlling land through One Map projects in Indonesia and Myanmar

cris.virtualsource.author-orcid34939b84-4c6b-402f-9163-9f52ddfdbf79
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorFaxon, Hilary Oliva
dc.contributor.authorGoldstein, Jenny E.
dc.contributor.authorFisher, Micah R.
dc.contributor.authorHunt, Glenn
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-15T09:43:53Z
dc.date.available2024-10-15T09:43:53Z
dc.date.issued2022-10
dc.description.abstractOnce confined to paper, national cartographic projects increasingly play out through spatial data infrastructures such as software programs and smartphones. Across the Global South, foreign donor-funded digital platforms emphasize transparency, accountability and data sharing while echoing colonial projects that consolidated statebased territorial knowledge. This article brings political geography scholarship on state and counter-mapping together with new work on the political ecology of data to highlight a contemporary dimension of territorialization, one in which state actors seek to consolidate and authorize national geospatial information onto digital platforms. We call attention to the role of data infrastructures in contemporary resource control, arguing that territorializing data both extends state territorialization onto digital platforms and, paradoxically, provides new avenues for non-state actors to claim land. Drawing on interviews, document review, and long-term fieldwork, we compare the origins, institutionalization and realization of Indonesia and Myanmar’s ‘One Map’ projects. Both projects aimed to create a government-managed online spatial data platform, building on national mapping and management traditions while responding to new international incentives, such as climate change mitigation in Indonesia and good democratic governance in Myanmar. While both projects encountered technical difficulties and evolved during implementation, different national histories and political trajectories resulted in the embrace and expansion of the program in Indonesia but reluctant participation and eventual crisis in Myanmar. Together, these cases show how spatial data infrastructures can both extend state control over space and offer opportunities for contesting or reimagining land and nation, even as such infrastructures remain embedded in local power relations.
dc.description.sponsorshipCentre for Development and Environment (CDE) - Just Economies & Human Well Being
dc.identifier.doi10.48350/178449
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102651
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/121363
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofPolitical geography
dc.relation.issn0962-6298
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C3D8E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.projectOneMap Myanmar Phase 2
dc.relation.projectSocio-Economic Transition
dc.titleTerritorializing spatial data: Controlling land through One Map projects in Indonesia and Myanmar
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.startPage102651
oaire.citation.volume98
oairecerif.author.affiliationCentre for Development and Environment (CDE) - Just Economies & Human Well Being
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2023-02-07 09:31:22
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId178449
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.relation.legacyproject857
unibe.relation.legacyproject804
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Faxon_et-al_2022_Territorializing_spatial_data__Controlling_land_through_One_Map_projects_in_Indonesia_and_Myanmar.pdf
Size:
3.23 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Content:
published

Collections