Treatment Cessation in Patients with Diabetic Maculopathy under Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy Following a Treat-and-Extend Protocol.
Options
BORIS DOI
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
40689259
Description
Objective
To assess the outcomes of treatment cessation due to disease stability in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).Design
A single-center, retrospective, consecutive case series.Subjects
Patients with DME who had received their first anti-VEGF treatment between 2012 and 2021, a Snellen best-corrected visual acuity (VA) ≥0.1, and a follow-up of ≥24 months.Methods
Baseline characteristics, best-corrected VA, OCT biomarkers over time, and injection details were collected from patients' medical records. Treatment interruption was defined as a treatment-free interval of ≥25 weeks after the last injection for any reason. An active decision for treatment interruption due to a stable retinal situation was defined as treatment cessation. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.Main Outcome Measures
Percentage of patients experiencing treatment cessation, time to treatment cessation and to reuptake, and change in best-corrected VA and central retinal thickness.Results
Beyond 109 eyes treated over ≥24 months, 81 eyes (62 patients) met the inclusion criteria. During a follow-up of 5.5 ± 2.3 (median 5) years, patients received 22.6 ± 14.9 (median 20) intravitreal injections, 7.7 ± 3.0 (8.0) of these in the first year. Fifty-seven eyes (70.4%) experienced ≥1 planned treatment cessation of ≥25 weeks, while 4 eyes experienced an unplanned treatment interruption. Treatment cessation was documented in 53 eyes (65.4%) 65.2 ± 52.4 (median 42) weeks after treatment initiation for 106.2 ± 110.4 (median 54) weeks. The reason for treatment cessation was patient-driven in 1 eye (1.9%; the patient wished to stop treatment against medical advice), physician-driven in 38 eyes (71.7%; stable VA, despite persisting residual retinal fluid in OCT), and OCT-driven in 14 eyes (26.4%; no retinal fluid in OCT). Baseline parameters were comparable between eyes experiencing treatment cessation and those which did not.Conclusions
Treatment cessation was achieved in 70% of eyes with DME after intensive treatment during the first year. This calls for a discussion about a possible systematic assessment of disease stability by omitting a single injection in eyes with stable residual retinal fluid.Financial Disclosures
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
To assess the outcomes of treatment cessation due to disease stability in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).Design
A single-center, retrospective, consecutive case series.Subjects
Patients with DME who had received their first anti-VEGF treatment between 2012 and 2021, a Snellen best-corrected visual acuity (VA) ≥0.1, and a follow-up of ≥24 months.Methods
Baseline characteristics, best-corrected VA, OCT biomarkers over time, and injection details were collected from patients' medical records. Treatment interruption was defined as a treatment-free interval of ≥25 weeks after the last injection for any reason. An active decision for treatment interruption due to a stable retinal situation was defined as treatment cessation. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.Main Outcome Measures
Percentage of patients experiencing treatment cessation, time to treatment cessation and to reuptake, and change in best-corrected VA and central retinal thickness.Results
Beyond 109 eyes treated over ≥24 months, 81 eyes (62 patients) met the inclusion criteria. During a follow-up of 5.5 ± 2.3 (median 5) years, patients received 22.6 ± 14.9 (median 20) intravitreal injections, 7.7 ± 3.0 (8.0) of these in the first year. Fifty-seven eyes (70.4%) experienced ≥1 planned treatment cessation of ≥25 weeks, while 4 eyes experienced an unplanned treatment interruption. Treatment cessation was documented in 53 eyes (65.4%) 65.2 ± 52.4 (median 42) weeks after treatment initiation for 106.2 ± 110.4 (median 54) weeks. The reason for treatment cessation was patient-driven in 1 eye (1.9%; the patient wished to stop treatment against medical advice), physician-driven in 38 eyes (71.7%; stable VA, despite persisting residual retinal fluid in OCT), and OCT-driven in 14 eyes (26.4%; no retinal fluid in OCT). Baseline parameters were comparable between eyes experiencing treatment cessation and those which did not.Conclusions
Treatment cessation was achieved in 70% of eyes with DME after intensive treatment during the first year. This calls for a discussion about a possible systematic assessment of disease stability by omitting a single injection in eyes with stable residual retinal fluid.Financial Disclosures
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Date of Publication
2025
Publication Type
Article
Keyword(s)
Anti-VEGF treatment
•
Diabetic macular edema
•
Treatment cessation
•
Treatment interruption
•
diabetic retinopathy
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Saucedo, Lucia | |
Pfister, Isabel B. | |
Schild, Christin |
Additional Credits
Series
Ophthalmology Science
Publisher
Elsevier
ISSN
2666-9145
Access(Rights)
open.access