Publication:
Proteomics of acquired pellicle in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with or without erosive tooth wear.

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-2435-1169
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-5950-4137
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidb471a08a-2bab-43cf-a3ce-9006312253c1
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid4b6c58d4-eaad-4e05-ae8e-a729915f8790
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid6374ed29-695a-4f29-a8fb-dfd77c0b4972
dc.contributor.authorMartini, Tatiana
dc.contributor.authorRios, Daniela
dc.contributor.authorCassiano, Luiza Paula Silva
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Cíntia Maria de Souza
dc.contributor.authorTaira, Even Akemi
dc.contributor.authorVentura, Talita Mendes Silva
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Heloísa Aparecida Barbosa Silva
dc.contributor.authorMagalhães, Ana Carolina
dc.contributor.authorSaads Carvalho, Thiago
dc.contributor.authorBaumann, Tommy
dc.contributor.authorLussi, Adrian
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Ricardo Brandt
dc.contributor.authorPalma-Dibb, Regina Guenka
dc.contributor.authorBuzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-08T15:11:06Z
dc.date.available2024-10-08T15:11:06Z
dc.date.issued2019-02
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES This in vivo study compared the protein profile of the acquired enamel pellicle (AEP) in volunteers 1) with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and erosive tooth wear (ETW) (BEWE ≥ 9; GE group); 2) with GERD without ETW (BEWE = 0; GNE group) and 3) control (without GERD and BEWE = 0; C group). MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-four subjects (8/group) participated. AEP was formed during 120 min and collected. After protein extraction, the samples were submitted to reverse phase liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Label-free proteomic quantification was performed using Protein Lynx Global Service software. RESULTS In total, 458 proteins were identified. Seventy-six proteins were common to all the groups. The proteomic profile of the AEP was quite different among the distinct groups. The numbers of proteins exclusively found in the C, GE and GNE groups were 113, 110 and 81, respectively. Most of the proteins exclusively identified in the C and GNE groups bind metals, while those in the GE group are mainly membrane proteins. Many proteins were found exclusively in the reflux groups. In the quantitative analyses, when the GNE group was compared with the GE group, the proteins with the highest decreases were Lysozyme C, Antileukoproteinase, Cathepsin G, Neutrophil defensins and Basic salivary proline-rich proteins, while those with the highest increases were subunits of Hemoglobin, Albumin and isoforms of Cystatin. CONCLUSION Profound alterations in the proteomic profile of the AEP were seen in GNE compared with GE volunteers, which might play a role in the resistance to ETW seen in the first. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE This pioneer study compared the proteomic profile of the AEP of patients with GERD with or without ETW. Increased proteins in those without ETW might be protective and are good candidates to be added to dental products to protect against erosion caused by intrinsic acids.
dc.description.numberOfPages6
dc.description.sponsorshipZahnmedizinische Kliniken, Klinik für Zahnerhaltung, Präventiv- und Kinderzahnmedizin
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.125270
dc.identifier.pmid30579861
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1016/j.jdent.2018.12.007
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/63327
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Science
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of dentistry
dc.relation.issn0300-5712
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BE8FE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subjectAcquired enamel pellicle Erosive tooth wear Gastroesophageal reflux Proteomics
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleProteomics of acquired pellicle in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with or without erosive tooth wear.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.endPage69
oaire.citation.startPage64
oaire.citation.volume81
oairecerif.author.affiliationZahnmedizinische Kliniken, Klinik für Zahnerhaltung, Präventiv- und Kinderzahnmedizin
oairecerif.author.affiliationZahnmedizinische Kliniken, Klinik für Zahnerhaltung, Präventiv- und Kinderzahnmedizin
oairecerif.author.affiliationZahnmedizinische Kliniken, Klinik für Zahnerhaltung, Präventiv- und Kinderzahnmedizin
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2019-10-24 09:59:58
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId125270
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleJ DENT
unibe.refereedTRUE
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
1-s2.0-S030057121830304X-main.pdf
Size:
234.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
publisher
Content:
published

Collections