• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. The Inextricable Subject: The Meaning of Theological Ethics for Dealing with Sexualized Violence in Church Contexts
 

The Inextricable Subject: The Meaning of Theological Ethics for Dealing with Sexualized Violence in Church Contexts

Options
  • Details
Publisher DOI
10.1177/00405736241292237
Description
Expert reports and studies have left the victims of church sexual abuse, in particular, but also church communities and the surrounding political and social entities dissatisfied. There is therefore a need to introduce a broader range of forms of reappraisal. In this context, adopting an ethical perspective can make a decisive contribution to addressing the problem of the prioritization of external perspectives, by introducing a programmatic approach to the subject that can be justified from the perspective of theological ethics. The unavoidability of the subject as a criterion for the so-called processing of sexual violence in ecclesiastical contexts will be justified here methodologically through an appeal to Reformed theology rooted in Zwingli. In this way, a broader theological consensus should be reached, as strong conceptions of the subject, as in liberal theology, are confronted with the problem of an excessively strong and not vulnerable position of the subject. A new, subject-oriented focus on individuals who have been the target of sexualized violence in church contexts entails a reversal of the previous way of looking at the vulnerability of sexual abuse and how a reappraisal might happen (if at all). The dominant practice so far has been for churches, investigating authorities, and researchers to address questions to victims of sexualized violence. However, there are specifically ethical reasons for adopting another, more subject-based perspective to at least the same extent. However, this has rarely been the case in practice.
Date of Publication
2025
Publication Type
Article
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Wirth, Mathias
Institute of Systematic Theology - Theological Ethics and Diaconia
Institute of Systematic Theology
Additional Credits
Institute of Systematic Theology - Theological Ethics and Diaconia
Institute of Systematic Theology
Series
Theology Today
Publisher
SAGE Publications
ISSN
0040-5736
Access(Rights)
metadata.only
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: dd892c [ 9.04. 8:30]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo