Influence of the layer thickness on the flexural strength of aged and non-aged additively manufactured interim dental material.
Options
BORIS DOI
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
35924435
Description
PURPOSE
To measure the flexural strength and Weibull characteristics of aged and non-aged printed interim dental material fabricated with different layer thickness.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Bars (25×2×2 mm) were additively fabricated by using a polymer printer (Asiga Max) and an interim resin (Nexdent C&B MFH). Specimens were fabricated with the same printing parameters and postprocessing procedures, but with 7 different layer thickness: 50 (control or 50-G group), 10 (10-G group), 25 (25-G group), 75 (75-G group), 100 (100-G group), 125 (125-G group), and 150 μm (150-G group). Two subgroups were created: non-aged and aged subgroups (n = 10). A universal testing machine was selected to measure flexural strength. Two-parameter Weibull distribution values were computed. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests were elected to examine the data (α = .05).
RESULTS
Artificial aging methods (P<.001) were a significant predictor of the flexural strength computed. Aged specimens acquired less flexural strength than non-aged specimens. The Weibull distribution obtained the highest shape for non-aged 50-G and 75-G group specimens compared with those of other non-aged groups, while the Weibull distribution showed the highest shape for aged 125-G specimens.
CONCLUSIONS
The flexural strength of the additively fabricated interim material examined was not influenced by the layer thickness at which the specimens were fabricated; however, artificial aging techniques reduced its flexural strength. Aged specimens presented lower Weibull distribution values compared with non-aged specimens, except for the 125-G specimens. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
To measure the flexural strength and Weibull characteristics of aged and non-aged printed interim dental material fabricated with different layer thickness.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Bars (25×2×2 mm) were additively fabricated by using a polymer printer (Asiga Max) and an interim resin (Nexdent C&B MFH). Specimens were fabricated with the same printing parameters and postprocessing procedures, but with 7 different layer thickness: 50 (control or 50-G group), 10 (10-G group), 25 (25-G group), 75 (75-G group), 100 (100-G group), 125 (125-G group), and 150 μm (150-G group). Two subgroups were created: non-aged and aged subgroups (n = 10). A universal testing machine was selected to measure flexural strength. Two-parameter Weibull distribution values were computed. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests were elected to examine the data (α = .05).
RESULTS
Artificial aging methods (P<.001) were a significant predictor of the flexural strength computed. Aged specimens acquired less flexural strength than non-aged specimens. The Weibull distribution obtained the highest shape for non-aged 50-G and 75-G group specimens compared with those of other non-aged groups, while the Weibull distribution showed the highest shape for aged 125-G specimens.
CONCLUSIONS
The flexural strength of the additively fabricated interim material examined was not influenced by the layer thickness at which the specimens were fabricated; however, artificial aging techniques reduced its flexural strength. Aged specimens presented lower Weibull distribution values compared with non-aged specimens, except for the 125-G specimens. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Date of Publication
2023-04
Publication Type
Article
Keyword(s)
3D printing additive manufacturing technologies interim dental prostheses provisional dental material vat-polymerization technologies
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Scherer, Michael | |
Barmak, Abdul B | |
Kois, John C | |
Özcan, Mutlu | |
Revilla-León, Marta |
Series
Journal of prosthodontics
Publisher
Wiley
ISSN
1532-849X
Access(Rights)
open.access