• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Medication Safety in Oncology Care: Mapping Checking Procedures From Prescription to Administration of Chemotherapy.
 

Medication Safety in Oncology Care: Mapping Checking Procedures From Prescription to Administration of Chemotherapy.

Options
  • Details
  • Files
BORIS DOI
10.7892/boris.112597
Publisher DOI
10.1200/JOP.2017.026427
PubMed ID
29481295
Description
PURPOSE

To increase medication safety in oncology, checking procedures are increasingly applied by nurses, physicians, and pharmacists. However, little is known about the number, types, and consistency of implemented checks. The aim of the study was to assess the number and types of different checking procedures that are performed along the lifecycle of a chemotherapy prescription across three hospitals, different care settings, administration routes, and professional groups.

METHODS

A scheme to evaluate checking procedures and a mapping approach to illustrate the checks along the phases of the medication process were developed. Checking procedures were assessed on the basis of analysis of internal guidelines and interviews with nurses and physicians who work on wards and in ambulatory infusion units of three hospitals.

RESULTS

There were considerable differences in number and type of checking procedures among administration routes, professional groups, wards and ambulatory infusion units, and hospitals. During the prescribing phase, the lowest number of checks was performed. In internal guidelines, checking procedures were documented poorly, though the pharmacy process was an exception.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to the pharmacists, nurse and physician clinician checking procedures are less standardized within and across hospitals. The results point to different checking habits for the professional groups; for example, physicians would rather perform plausibility reviews than checks. Our evaluation scheme to categorize checks and the visualized mapping approach was feasible and understandable for practitioners.
Date of Publication
2018-04
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology > 360 Social problems & social services
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Pfeiffer, Yvonne
Gut, Stephan S
Schwappach, Davidorcid-logo
Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
Stiftung für Patientensicherheit
Additional Credits
Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
Series
Journal of oncology practice
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN
1935-469X
Access(Rights)
open.access
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: dd892c [ 9.04. 8:30]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo