Publication:
Sex-specific evaluation and redevelopment of the GRACE score in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes in populations from the UK and Switzerland: a multinational analysis with external cohort validation.

cris.virtualsource.author-orcid3fda0c3a-0cd0-438e-8e23-e3486ee2ffe0
dc.contributor.authorWenzl, Florian A
dc.contributor.authorKraler, Simon
dc.contributor.authorAmbler, Gareth
dc.contributor.authorWeston, Clive
dc.contributor.authorHerzog, Sereina A
dc.contributor.authorRäber, Lorenz
dc.contributor.authorMuller, Olivier
dc.contributor.authorCamici, Giovanni G
dc.contributor.authorRoffi, Marco
dc.contributor.authorRickli, Hans
dc.contributor.authorFox, Keith A A
dc.contributor.authorde Belder, Mark
dc.contributor.authorRadovanovic, Dragana
dc.contributor.authorDeanfield, John
dc.contributor.authorLüscher, Thomas F
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-11T17:08:36Z
dc.date.available2024-10-11T17:08:36Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-03
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) 2.0 score was developed and validated in predominantly male patient populations. We aimed to assess its sex-specific performance in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) and to develop an improved score (GRACE 3.0) that accounts for sex differences in disease characteristics. METHODS We evaluated the GRACE 2.0 score in 420 781 consecutive patients with NSTE-ACS in contemporary nationwide cohorts from the UK and Switzerland. Machine learning models to predict in-hospital mortality were informed by the GRACE variables and developed in sex-disaggregated data from 386 591 patients from England, Wales, and Northern Ireland (split into a training cohort of 309 083 [80·0%] patients and a validation cohort of 77 508 [20·0%] patients). External validation of the GRACE 3.0 score was done in 20 727 patients from Switzerland. FINDINGS Between Jan 1, 2005, and Aug 27, 2020, 400 054 patients with NSTE-ACS in the UK and 20 727 patients with NSTE-ACS in Switzerland were included in the study. Discrimination of in-hospital death by the GRACE 2.0 score was good in male patients (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0·86, 95% CI 0·86-0·86) and notably lower in female patients (0·82, 95% CI 0·81-0·82; p<0·0001). The GRACE 2.0 score underestimated in-hospital mortality risk in female patients, favouring their incorrect stratification to the low-to-intermediate risk group, for which the score does not indicate early invasive treatment. Accounting for sex differences, GRACE 3.0 showed superior discrimination and good calibration with an AUC of 0·91 (95% CI 0·89-0·92) in male patients and 0·87 (95% CI 0·84-0·89) in female patients in an external cohort validation. GRACE 3·0 led to a clinically relevant reclassification of female patients to the high-risk group. INTERPRETATION The GRACE 2.0 score has limited discriminatory performance and underestimates in-hospital mortality in female patients with NSTE-ACS. The GRACE 3.0 score performs better in men and women and reduces sex inequalities in risk stratification. FUNDING Swiss National Science Foundation, Swiss Heart Foundation, Lindenhof Foundation, Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, and Theodor-Ida-Herzog-Egli Foundation.
dc.description.numberOfPages13
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversitätsklinik für Kardiologie
dc.identifier.doi10.48350/172617
dc.identifier.pmid36049493
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01483-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/87188
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofThe lancet
dc.relation.issn1474-547X
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BB15E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleSex-specific evaluation and redevelopment of the GRACE score in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes in populations from the UK and Switzerland: a multinational analysis with external cohort validation.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.endPage756
oaire.citation.issue10354
oaire.citation.startPage744
oaire.citation.volume400
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Kardiologie
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2022-09-05 07:56:02
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId172617
unibe.refereedTRUE
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
1-s2.0-S0140673622014830-main.pdf
Size:
2.41 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Content:
published

Collections