• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Trueness of merging partial arch scans using different intraoral scanners for diagnostic casts: A proof of concept.
 

Trueness of merging partial arch scans using different intraoral scanners for diagnostic casts: A proof of concept.

Options
  • Details
  • Files
BORIS DOI
10.48620/92444
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106213
PubMed ID
41198012
Description
Objective
To evaluate whether digitizing dentate partial arch casts with intraoral scanners (IOSs) achieves trueness comparable to casts from irreversible hydrocolloid complete arch impressions.Methods
Maxillary and mandibular dentate typodonts were digitized with an industrial-grade scanner to generate master STL files. Five irreversible hydrocolloid partial arch impressions of the right and left quadrants and anterior region, and five complete arch impressions were made and poured in stone (Control, C). Each partial arch cast was scanned with two IOSs (CEREC Primescan [PS] and TRIOS 3 [TS]), while complete arch stone casts were digitized with the industrial scanner. The master files and all scan files were imported into a metrology-grade analysis software program to evaluate surface deviations (μm), linear distances between canine cusp tips and second molar distal marginal ridges (μm), and intermolar width deviations (μm). The data were analyzed using generalized linear model analysis (α = 0.05).Results
The interaction between main factors affected the surface deviations, while the dental arch affected the intermolar width deviations (P ≤ 0.040). PS-mandible had the highest surface deviations (P ≤ 0.047), except for TS-mandible (P > 0.050). TS-mandible had higher surface deviations than C-maxilla and C-mandible (P ≤ 0.032). Maxillary intermolar width deviations were higher than mandibular (P = 0.043).Conclusions
Conventional mandibular impressions had higher surface trueness than partial arch cast scans. When PS was used, maxillary partial arch cast scans had higher trueness than mandibular. Mandibular impressions had higher intermolar width trueness. Nevertheless, all measured deviations can be considered clinically acceptable according to previously reported ranges.Clinical Significance
When maxillary and mandibular impressions are needed in restricted mouth opening situations, tested intraoral scanners can be considered to scan partial arch casts to subsequently virtually merge them to obtain the arch's impression.
Date of Publication
2026-01
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
Keyword(s)
Diagnostic cast
•
Intraoral scanner
•
Trueness
•
merging
•
partial arch scan
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Dönmez, Mustafa Borga
School of Dental Medicine, Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology
Eng, Christian
Demirel, Münir
Çakmak, Gülce
School of Dental Medicine
Kahveci, Çiğdem
Neuhaus, Klaus Wen Lungorcid-logo
School of Dental Medicine, Clinic of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry
Yilmaz, Burak
School of Dental Medicine, Clinic of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry
Additional Credits
School of Dental Medicine, Clinic of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry
School of Dental Medicine, Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology
School of Dental Medicine
Series
Journal of Dentistry
Publisher
Elsevier
ISSN
1879-176X
0300-5712
Access(Rights)
open.access
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: dd892c [ 9.04. 8:30]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo