Publication:
Evaluation of custom-made Relay® stent-grafts for aortic arch landing zones 0 and I: experience from two high-volume aortic centres.

cris.virtualsource.author-orcid34082018-4e00-4f70-88ed-eb2cbe380b79
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid137ecfcd-fadc-476a-a311-54d2603f5a93
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidbdc7dd7d-1caf-4318-baf9-9fd627f3c2b7
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid7bfc88b4-4943-44d0-b26b-0374452d81ac
datacite.rightsrestricted
dc.contributor.authorDabravolskaite, Vaiva
dc.contributor.authorMakaloski, Vladimir
dc.contributor.authorHakovirta, Harri
dc.contributor.authorKotelis, Drosos
dc.contributor.authorSchoenhoff, Florian S.
dc.contributor.authorLescan, Mario
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-22T08:20:31Z
dc.date.available2025-01-22T08:20:31Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-01
dc.description.abstractObjectives To report experience with a Relay® stent-graft custom-made platform in treating different aortic arch pathology in 2 high-volume aortic centres.Methods A retrospective analysis of all patients treated between July 2016 and July 2023 with custom-made Relay® stent-graft (custom-made device). Underlying aortic arch pathology was an aneurysm, penetrating aortic ulcer, and dissection. Three custom-made device designs were used: proximal scallop, fenestrations, and inner branches. The endpoints were technical success, perioperative stroke, death, and reintervention rate.Results Thirty-five patients (89% males) with a mean age of 70 ± 11 years were treated.Indication for treatment was penetrating aortic ulcer in 14 patients (40%), aneurysm in 11 patients (31%) and aortic dissection in 10 patients (29%). The technical success rate was 100%. Twenty-eight patients (80%) had proximal sealing in zone 0, and 7 (20%) had proximal sealing in zone 1. Nine patients (25.6%) had proximal scallops, 9 (25.6%) had 1 big fenestration and 17 (48.8%) had a branched device; 1 with single branch, 15 with double branches and 1 with triple branches. Thirty patients (86%) had previous or simultaneous left subclavian artery revascularization. No patient died during 30 days. Two patients (5.7%) had stroke postoperatively; both recovered without disabling deficits. The mean follow-up was 35 ± 26 months. Six patients (17.1%) died during follow-up. One patient required reinforcement of the bridging stent in the left common carotid artery and one additional vascular plugging of the left subclavian artery. Three patients received distal extension.Conclusions The Relay® stent-graft custom-made platform showed a good performance in our study with a high technical success rate, low perioperative stroke and mortality, and low reintervention rates during the follow-up.
dc.description.sponsorshipClinic of Vascular Surgery
dc.description.sponsorshipClinic of Heart Surgery
dc.identifier.doi10.48620/84806
dc.identifier.pmid38991832
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1093/ejcts/ezae241
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/194431
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
dc.relation.issn1873-734X
dc.relation.issn1010-7940
dc.subjectAortic arch
dc.subjectCustom-made platform
dc.subjectDesign diversity
dc.subjectRelay®
dc.subjectstent-graft
dc.titleEvaluation of custom-made Relay® stent-grafts for aortic arch landing zones 0 and I: experience from two high-volume aortic centres.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.volume66
oairecerif.author.affiliationClinic of Vascular Surgery
oairecerif.author.affiliationClinic of Vascular Surgery
oairecerif.author.affiliationClinic of Vascular Surgery
oairecerif.author.affiliationClinic of Heart Surgery
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.rolecorresponding author
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
ezae241.pdf
Size:
2.04 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
Content:
published

Collections