• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Amplatzer left atrial appendage occlusion: single center 10-year experience
 

Amplatzer left atrial appendage occlusion: single center 10-year experience

Options
  • Details
  • Files
BORIS DOI
10.7892/boris.41683
Publisher DOI
10.1002/ccd.24872
PubMed ID
23412815
Description
OBJECTIVES

To report a 10-year single center experience with Amplatzer devices for left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion.

BACKGROUND

Intermediate-term outcome data following LAA occlusion are scarce.

METHODS

Short- and intermediate-term outcomes of patients who underwent LAA occlusion were assessed. All procedures were performed under local aesthesia without transesophageal echocardiography. Patients were discharged on acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel for 1-6 months.

RESULTS

LAA occlusion was attempted in 152 patients (105 males, age 72 ± 10 years, CHA2 DS2 -Vasc-score 3.4 ± 1.7, HAS-BLED-score 2.4 ± 1.2). Nondedicated devices were used in 32 patients (21%, ND group) and dedicated Amplatzer Cardiac Plugs were used in 120 patients (79%, ACP group). A patent foramen ovale or atrial septal defect was used for left atrial access and closed at the end of LAA occlusion in 40 patients. The short-term safety endpoints (procedural complications, bleeds) occurred in 15 (9.8%) and the efficacy endpoints (death, stroke, systemic embolization) in 0 patients. Device embolization occurred more frequently in the ND as compared to the ACP group (5 patients or 12% vs. 2 patients or 2%). Mean intermediate-term follow up of the study population was 32 months (range 1-120). Late deaths occurred in 15 patients (5 cardiovascular, 7 noncardiac, 3 unexplained). Neurologic events occurred in 2, peripheral embolism in 1, and major bleeding in 4 patients. The composite efficacy and safety endpoint occurred in 7% and 12% of patients.

CONCLUSION

LAA closure may be a good alternative to oral anticoagulation. This hypothesis needs to be tested in a randomized clinical trial to ensure that all potential biases of this observational study are accounted for.
Date of Publication
2013-08-01
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
Keyword(s)
device closure
•
embolism
•
interventional closure
•
left atrial appendage
•
stroke
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Nietlispach, Fabian
Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie
Glökler, Steffen
Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie
Krause, René
Universitätsklinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Kompetenzbereich für Psychosomatische Medizin
Shakir, Samera
Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie
Schmid, Michael
Khattab, Ahmed Aziz
Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie
Wenaweser, Peter Martin
Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie
Windecker, Stephan
Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie
Meier, Bernhard
Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie
Additional Credits
Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie
Universitätsklinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Kompetenzbereich für Psychosomatische Medizin
Series
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN
1522-1946
Access(Rights)
restricted
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: dd892c [ 9.04. 8:30]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo