Drug provocation tests (DPTs) of contrast media: Useful or not useful? - A narrative review.
Options
BORIS DOI
Date of Publication
September 2024
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute
Subject(s)
Series
World Allergy Organization Journal
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
1939-4551
Publisher
Elsevier
Language
English
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
39252791
Uncontrolled Keywords
Description
Drug provocation tests (DPTs) are also used in some patients with a history of a contrast medium (CM)-hypersensitivity reaction. Since the use of contrast agents requires special knowledge that is present in radiology but not necessarily in allergology, this overview should close the knowledge gaps. The literature, and the package inserts of the industry dealing with DPTs in contrast hypersensitivity reactions was analyzed and the results presented. Historical analyses revealed that provocation tests were already done in the past, and called pre-testing. Due to disadvantages, this diagnostic tool was abandoned. A few years later, DPT was introduced as an innovative diagnostic procedure. The DPT has the 3 main disadvantages: a missing standardization, patients at risk (such as compromised renal function) are rarely taken into account, and a negative DPT does not exclude a subsequent CM reaction. DPTs (formerly called pre-testing) are a well-known method for diagnosing CM-related hypersensitivity reactions. Since the disadvantages of this diagnosis outweigh the advantages, we propose replacing DPT with routine contrast-enhanced imaging examination in radiology.
File(s)
File | File Type | Format | Size | License | Publisher/Copright statement | Content | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S1939455124000772-main.pdf | text | Adobe PDF | 677.63 KB | published |