Publication:
Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-6466-2199
cris.virtualsource.author-orcide0f2a987-b3b7-4dc9-a908-622eeb2e1d4d
cris.virtualsource.author-orcide2bfeb07-f522-48a3-81dd-f43fb598afdb
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid5fcd9467-3cf3-49dd-b5d9-2ef9670de6b6
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidc2f7422c-622a-4b06-810d-767d48b2ee2d
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidcf0ee0bd-ea69-4a30-a602-84bf0f97b85a
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorZürcher, Sven Méric
dc.contributor.authorMartignoni, Zora Teresa
dc.contributor.authorHunger, Robert
dc.contributor.authorBenzaquen, Michael Joseph
dc.contributor.authorJafari, Morteza
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-26T18:32:11Z
dc.date.available2024-10-26T18:32:11Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-28
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND The first-line treatment of the localized form of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) remains surgical excision. Either conventional excision (CE) with margins or Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) may be preferred, depending on the risk factors of cSCC, the characteristics of the tumor, and the available technical facilities. METHODS This article presents a systematic review of the current literature spanning from 1974 to 2023, comparing outcomes of cSCC treated with MMS versus cSCC treated with conventional excision. RESULTS Out of the 6821 records identified through the database search, a total of 156 studies were screened, of which 10 were included in the review. The majority of the included studies showed that treatment of cSCC with MMS consistently exhibits a significantly lower risk of recurrence compared to treatment with CE. In addition, MMS is emerging as the preferred technique for the resection of cSCC located in aesthetically or functionally challenging anatomical areas. CONCLUSION The studies generally demonstrate that MMS is a safer and more effective treatment of cSCC than CE. Nevertheless, outcomes such as recurrence rates and cost-effectiveness should be assessed more precisely, in order to allow for a more tailored approach in determining the appropriate indication for the use of MMS.
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversitätsklinik für Dermatologie
dc.identifier.doi10.48350/198983
dc.identifier.pmid39001454
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.3390/cancers16132394
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/179129
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.ispartofCancers
dc.relation.issn2072-6694
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BAD9E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subjectMohs surgery non-melanoma skin cancer recurrence squamous cell carcinoma standard excision
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleMohs Micrographic Surgery for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.issue13
oaire.citation.volume16
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Dermatologie
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Dermatologie
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Dermatologie
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Dermatologie
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Dermatologie
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2024-07-17 11:31:15
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId198983
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlereview

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
cancers-16-02394-v2.pdf
Size:
406 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Content:
published

Collections