• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Teacher and Student Perceptions of Jump Quality: Deriving Objective Thresholds and Examining Rating Agreement in Adolescent Ballet Dancers.
 

Teacher and Student Perceptions of Jump Quality: Deriving Objective Thresholds and Examining Rating Agreement in Adolescent Ballet Dancers.

Options
  • Details
  • Files
BORIS DOI
10.48620/97118
Publisher DOI
10.1177/1089313X261431883
PubMed ID
41885364
Description
Background: Jumping is fundamental to vocational ballet training, yet physiological metrics are rarely assessed, leaving teachers and students reliant on subjective appraisals of jump quality. The accuracy of these perceptual judgements and their relationship to objective performance remain largely unexplored in young dancers. Purpose: To establish teacher-referenced countermovement jump (CMJ) thresholds corresponding to 1-5 ordinal ratings of jump quality in adolescent ballet dancers, and to examine student-teacher agreement patterns across sex and developmental stages. Methods: In a cross-sectional study of 133 vocational ballet students (84 females, 49 males; aged 11-19 years), teachers rated jump quality (1-5 scale) during standardized ballet sequences while students self-rated their abilities. CMJ height was assessed via Optojump. Receiver operating characteristic analysis with Youden's J optimization derived sex- and age-specific thresholds mapping teacher ratings to CMJ cut-points (cm). Student-teacher agreement was evaluated using quadratically weighted Cohen's k, confusion matrices, and McNemar tests. Analyses were stratified by sex and year-group (Y7-9, Y10-11, Y12-14). Results: Teacher-anchored thresholds increased with age and were higher in males (M Y10-11: 31.5-37.6 cm across rating categories; F Y10-11: 25.6 cm for ratings ≥4). CMJ demonstrated moderate discriminative ability (AUCs 0.41-0.88), indicating meaningful but incomplete correspondence with teacher ratings. Student-teacher agreement was partial (k = 0.05-0.55), with no directional bias in females but systematic patterns in males: teachers rated older males approximately one category higher than self-ratings (median difference = 1, P < .01). DeLong tests confirmed consistent discriminative ability across groups (P > .05). Sensitivity analyses verified robustness to leg-length adjustment, teacher clustering, and outlier exclusion. Conclusions: Sex- and age-specific CMJ thresholds provide practical benchmarks for calibrating subjective judgements in ballet pedagogy. Moderate AUCs reflect the multi-dimensional nature of jump quality, encompassing aesthetic and technical elements beyond vertical displacement. Systematic student under-rating relative to teacher assessment, particularly among older males, highlights the need for pedagogical strategies supporting realistic self-appraisal alongside technical development.
Date of Publication
2026-03-26
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
700 Arts > 790 Sports, games & entertainment
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
Keyword(s)
assessment
•
athletic training
•
dance screening
•
dance training
•
jumping
•
pedagogy
•
strength and conditioning
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Mihaila, Raluca-Ioana
Schrefl, Anna
Institute of Sport Science (ISPW)
Brass, Scarlett
Dennehy, Ella
Wyon, Matt
Metsios, George
Kolokythas, Nico
Additional Credits
Institute of Sport Science (ISPW)
Series
Journal of dance medicine & science
Publisher
SAGE Publications
ISSN
2374-8060
1089-313X
Access(Rights)
open.access
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: dd892c [ 9.04. 8:30]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo