Publication:
Generating comparative evidence on new drugs and devices before approval.

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-3830-8508
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidade91a16-6e2b-4d1c-b538-15aac7c36747
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorNaci, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorSalcher-Konrad, Maximilian
dc.contributor.authorKesselheim, Aaron S
dc.contributor.authorWieseler, Beate
dc.contributor.authorRochaix, Lise
dc.contributor.authorRedberg, Rita F
dc.contributor.authorSalanti, Georgia
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Emily
dc.contributor.authorGarner, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorStroup, T Scott
dc.contributor.authorCipriani, Andrea
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-02T15:47:00Z
dc.date.available2024-09-02T15:47:00Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-21
dc.description.abstractFewer than half of new drugs have data on their comparative benefits and harms against existing treatment options at the time of regulatory approval in Europe and the USA. Even when active-comparator trials exist, they might not produce meaningful data to inform decisions in clinical practice and health policy. The uncertainty associated with the paucity of well designed active-comparator trials has been compounded by legal and regulatory changes in Europe and the USA that have created a complex mix of expedited programmes aimed at facilitating faster access to new drugs. Comparative evidence generation is even sparser for medical devices. Some have argued that the current process for regulatory approval needs to generate more evidence that is useful for patients, clinicians, and payers in health-care systems. We propose a set of five key principles relevant to the European Medicines Agency, European medical device regulatory agencies, US Food and Drug Administration, as well as payers, that we believe will provide the necessary incentives for pharmaceutical and device companies to generate comparative data on drugs and devices and assure timely availability of evidence that is useful for decision making. First, labelling should routinely inform patients and clinicians whether comparative data exist on new products. Second, regulators should be more selective in their use of programmes that facilitate drug and device approvals on the basis of incomplete benefit and harm data. Third, regulators should encourage the conduct of randomised trials with active comparators. Fourth, regulators should use prospectively designed network meta-analyses based on existing and future randomised trials. Last, payers should use their policy levers and negotiating power to incentivise the generation of comparative evidence on new and existing drugs and devices, for example, by explicitly considering proven added benefit in pricing and payment decisions.
dc.description.numberOfPages12
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.142738
dc.identifier.pmid32199486
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33178-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/35378
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofLancet
dc.relation.issn0140-6736
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BECFE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.subject.ddc300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology::360 - Social problems & social services
dc.titleGenerating comparative evidence on new drugs and devices before approval.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage997
oaire.citation.issue10228
oaire.citation.startPage986
oaire.citation.volume395
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.embargoChanged2021-03-22 01:30:02
unibe.date.licenseChanged2020-04-09 04:28:05
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId142738
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleLANCET
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Name:
Naci Lancet2020.pdf
Size:
1.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License:
publisher
Content:
published
Name:
Naci Lancet2020_AAM.pdf
Size:
623.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Content:
accepted

Collections