• LOGIN
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publication
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. How transparent are transparency reports? Comparative analysis of transparency reporting across online platforms
 

How transparent are transparency reports? Comparative analysis of transparency reporting across online platforms

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.48350/172109
Date of Publication
April 2023
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Institut für Kommunik...

Author
Urman, Aleksandraorcid-logo
Institut für Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft (ikmb)
Makhortykh, Mykolaorcid-logo
Institut für Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft (ikmb)
Subject(s)

000 - Computer scienc...

300 - Social sciences...

300 - Social sciences...

Series
Telecommunications Policy
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
1879-3258
Publisher
Elsevier
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102477
Uncontrolled Keywords

transparency report

transparency

online platform

Santa Clara Principle...

compliance

comparative analysis

regulation

Digital Services Act

Alphabet

Meta

Twitter

Description
Over the last decade, transparency reports have been adopted by most large information technology companies. These reports provide important information on the requests tech companies receive from state actors around the world and the ways they respond to these requests, including what content the companies remove from platforms they own. In theory, such reports shall make inner workings of companies more transparent, in particular with respect to their collaboration with state actors. They shall also allow users and external entities (e.g., researchers or watchdogs) to assess to what extent companies adhere to their own policies on user privacy and content moderation as well as to the principles formulated by global entities that advocate for the freedom of expression and privacy online such as the Global Network Initiative or Santa Clara Principles. However, whether the current state of transparency reports actually is conducive to meaningful transparency remains an open question. In this paper, we aim to address this through a critical comparative analysis of transparency reports using Santa Clara Principles 2.0 (SCP 2.0) as the main analytical framework. Specifically, we aim to make three contributions: first, we conduct a comparative analysis of the types of data disclosed by major tech companies and social media platforms in their transparency reports. The companies and platforms analyzed include Google (incl. YouTube), Microsoft (incl. its subsidiaries Github and LinkedIn), Apple, Meta (prev. Facebook), TikTok, Twitter, Snapchat, Pinterest, Reddit and Amazon (incl. subsidiary Twitch). Second, we evaluate to what degree the released information complies with SCP 2.0 and how it aligns with different purposes of transparency. Finally, we outline recommendations that could improve the level of transparency within the reports and beyond, and contextualize our recommendations with regard to the Digital Services Act (DSA) that received the final approval of the European Council in October 2022.
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/86790
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
1-s2.0-S0308596122001793-main.pdftextAdobe PDF1.04 MBpublishedOpen
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 360c85 [14.04. 8:05]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo