Publication:
Protocol for a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial investigating sacral neuromodulation for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction

cris.virtualsource.author-orcidfe76bd76-0188-4f92-a037-e67f8c762438
cris.virtualsource.author-orcide4d8951c-e7de-419f-90b5-ba447daa72b3
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid0e759413-1b84-479a-86e3-790e4ba34079
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidf3def9ad-2068-403c-8f3f-80eecdb88337
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorKnüpfer, Stephanie C
dc.contributor.authorLiechti, Martina D
dc.contributor.authorMordasini, Livio Marco
dc.contributor.authorAbt, Dominik
dc.contributor.authorEngeler, Daniel S
dc.contributor.authorWöllner, Jens
dc.contributor.authorPannek, Jürgen
dc.contributor.authorKiss, Bernhard
dc.contributor.authorBurkhard, Fiona Christine
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Marc P
dc.contributor.authorMiramontes, Elena
dc.contributor.authorKessels, Alfons G
dc.contributor.authorBachmann, Lucas M
dc.contributor.authorKessler, Thomas M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-23T17:34:33Z
dc.date.available2024-10-23T17:34:33Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Sacral neuromodulation has become a well-established and widely accepted treatment for refractory non-neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, but its value in patients with a neurological cause is unclear. Although there is evidence indicating that sacral neuromodulation may be effective and safe for treating neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, the number of investigated patients is low and there is a lack of randomized controlled trials. METHODS AND DESIGN This study is a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind multicenter trial including 4 sacral neuromodulation referral centers in Switzerland. Patients with refractory neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction are enrolled. After minimally invasive bilateral tined lead placement into the sacral foramina S3 and/or S4, patients undergo prolonged sacral neuromodulation testing for 3-6 weeks. In case of successful (defined as improvement of at least 50% in key bladder diary variables (i.e. number of voids and/or number of leakages, post void residual) compared to baseline values) prolonged sacral neuromodulation testing, the neuromodulator is implanted in the upper buttock. After a 2 months post-implantation phase when the neuromodulator is turned ON to optimize the effectiveness of neuromodulation using sub-sensory threshold stimulation, the patients are randomized in a 1:1 allocation in sacral neuromodulation ON or OFF. At the end of the 2 months double-blind sacral neuromodulation phase, the patients have a neuro-urological re-evaluation, unblinding takes place, and the neuromodulator is turned ON in all patients. The primary outcome measure is success of sacral neuromodulation, secondary outcome measures are adverse events, urodynamic parameters, questionnaires, and costs of sacral neuromodulation. DISCUSSION It is of utmost importance to know whether the minimally invasive and completely reversible sacral neuromodulation would be a valuable treatment option for patients with refractory neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. If this type of treatment is effective in the neurological population, it would revolutionize the management of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. TRIAL REGISTRATION TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT02165774.
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversitätsklinik für Urologie
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.63439
dc.identifier.pmid25123172
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1186/1471-2490-14-65
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/129470
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBMC
dc.relation.ispartofBMC urology
dc.relation.issn1471-2490
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C238E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleProtocol for a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial investigating sacral neuromodulation for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.startPage65
oaire.citation.volume14
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Urologie
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Urologie
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Urologie
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Urologie
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId63439
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleBMC UROL
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
1471-2490-14-65.pdf
Size:
229.02 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Content:
published

Collections