• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Comparison of Investigator-Reported and Clinical Event Committee-Adjudicated Outcome Events in GLASSY.
 

Comparison of Investigator-Reported and Clinical Event Committee-Adjudicated Outcome Events in GLASSY.

Options
  • Details
  • Files
BORIS DOI
10.48350/152086
Publisher DOI
10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006581
PubMed ID
33535773
Description
BACKGROUND

Event adjudication by a clinical event committee (CEC) provides a standardized, independent outcome assessment. However, the added value of CEC to investigators reporting remains debated. GLASSY (GLOBAL LEADERS Adjudication Sub-Study) implemented, in a subset of the open-label, investigator-reported (IR) GLOBAL LEADERS trial, an independent adjudication process of reported and unreported potential outcome events (triggers). We describe metrics of GLASSY feasibility and efficiency, diagnostic accuracy of IR events, and their concordance with corresponding CEC-adjudicated events.

METHODS

We report the proportion of myocardial infarction, bleeding, stroke, and stent thrombosis triggers with sufficient evidence for assessment (feasibility) that were adjudicated as outcome events (efficiency), stratified by source (IR or non-IR). Using CEC-adjudicated events as criterion standard, we describe sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and global diagnostic accuracy of IR events. Using Gwet AC coefficient, we examine the concordance between IR- and corresponding CEC-adjudicated triggers. There was sufficient evidence for assessment for 2592 (98.3%) of 2636 triggers.

RESULTS

Overall, the adjudicated end point-to-trigger ratio was high and similar between IR- (88%) and non-IR-reported (87%) triggers. The global diagnostic accuracy and concordance between IR-reported and CEC-adjudicated outcome events was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.65-0.74) and 0.54 (95% CI, 0.45-0.62), respectively, for myocardial infarction; 0.77 (95% CI, 0.75-0.79) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.68-0.74) for bleeding; 0.70 (95% CI, 0.62-0.79) and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.43-0.74) for stroke; 0.59 (95% CI, 0.52-0.66) and 0.39 (95% CI, 0.25-0.53) for stent thrombosis. For IR bleedings, the concordance with the CEC on type of events was generally weak.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing CEC adjudication in a pragmatic open-label trial with IR events is feasible and efficient. Our findings of modest global diagnostic accuracy for IR events and generally weak concordance between investigators and CEC support the role for CEC adjudication in such settings. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03231059.
Date of Publication
2021-02
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
Keyword(s)
benchmarking feasibility studies hemorrhage myocardial infarction thrombosis
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Leonardi, Sergio
Branca, Mattia
Clinical Trials Unit Bern (CTU)
Franzone, Anna
McFadden, Eugene
Piccolo, Raffaele
Jüni, Peter
Vranckx, Pascal
Steg, Philippe Gabriel
Serruys, Patrick W
Benit, Edouard
Liebetrau, Christoph
Janssens, Luc
Ferrario, Maurizio
Zurakowski, Aleksander
Diletti, Roberto
Dominici, Marcello
Huber, Kurt
Slagboom, Ton
Buszman, Pawel
Bolognese, Leonardo
Tumscitz, Carlo
Bryniarski, Krzysztof
Aminian, Adel
Vrolix, Mathias
Petrov, Ivo
Garg, Scot
Naber, Cristoph
Prokopczuk, Janusz
Hamm, Christian
Heg, Dierik Hansorcid-logo
Clinical Trials Unit Bern (CTU)
Windecker, Stephan
Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie
Valgimigli, Marco
Additional Credits
Clinical Trials Unit Bern (CTU)
Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie
Series
Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes
Publisher
American Heart Association
ISSN
1941-7705
Access(Rights)
restricted
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: dd892c [ 9.04. 8:30]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo