Publication:
Guidance on Noncorticosteroid Systemic Immunomodulatory Therapy in Noninfectious Uveitis: Fundamentals Of Care for UveitiS (FOCUS) Initiative.

datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorDick, Andrew D
dc.contributor.authorRosenbaum, James T
dc.contributor.authorAl-Dhibi, Hassan A
dc.contributor.authorBelfort, Rubens
dc.contributor.authorBrézin, Antoine P
dc.contributor.authorChee, Soon Phaik
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Janet L
dc.contributor.authorRamanan, Athimalaipet V
dc.contributor.authorSonoda, Koh-Hei
dc.contributor.authorCarreño, Ester
dc.contributor.authorNascimento, Heloisa
dc.contributor.authorSalah, Sawsen
dc.contributor.authorSalek, Sherveen
dc.contributor.authorSiak, Jay
dc.contributor.authorSteeples, Laura
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-07T16:53:14Z
dc.date.available2024-10-07T16:53:14Z
dc.date.issued2018-05
dc.description.abstractTOPIC An international, expert-led consensus initiative to develop systematic, evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis in the era of biologics. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The availability of biologic agents for the treatment of human eye disease has altered practice patterns for the management of noninfectious uveitis. Current guidelines are insufficient to assure optimal use of noncorticosteroid systemic immunomodulatory agents. METHODS An international expert steering committee comprising 9 uveitis specialists (including both ophthalmologists and rheumatologists) identified clinical questions and, together with 6 bibliographic fellows trained in uveitis, conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol systematic review of the literature (English language studies from January 1996 through June 2016; Medline [OVID], the Central Cochrane library, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, BIOSIS, and Web of Science). Publications included randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective studies with sufficient follow-up, case series with 15 cases or more, peer-reviewed articles, and hand-searched conference abstracts from key conferences. The proposed statements were circulated among 130 international uveitis experts for review. A total of 44 globally representative group members met in late 2016 to refine these guidelines using a modified Delphi technique and assigned Oxford levels of evidence. RESULTS In total, 10 questions were addressed resulting in 21 evidence-based guidance statements covering the following topics: when to start noncorticosteroid immunomodulatory therapy, including both biologic and nonbiologic agents; what data to collect before treatment; when to modify or withdraw treatment; how to select agents based on individual efficacy and safety profiles; and evidence in specific uveitic conditions. Shared decision-making, communication among providers and safety monitoring also were addressed as part of the recommendations. Pharmacoeconomic considerations were not addressed. CONCLUSIONS Consensus guidelines were developed based on published literature, expert opinion, and practical experience to bridge the gap between clinical needs and medical evidence to support the treatment of patients with noninfectious uveitis with noncorticosteroid immunomodulatory agents.
dc.description.noteC. Tappeiner is a member of the 'Fundamentals of Care for Uveitis International Consensus Group'.
dc.description.numberOfPages17
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.123080
dc.identifier.pmid29310963
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.11.017
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/61962
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofOphthalmology
dc.relation.issn0161-6420
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BB12E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleGuidance on Noncorticosteroid Systemic Immunomodulatory Therapy in Noninfectious Uveitis: Fundamentals Of Care for UveitiS (FOCUS) Initiative.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.endPage773
oaire.citation.issue5
oaire.citation.startPage757
oaire.citation.volume125
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2019-12-03 12:56:38
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId123080
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleOPHTHALMOLOGY
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlereview

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
1-s2.0-S0161642017324466-main.pdf
Size:
606.73 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Content:
published

Collections