Publication:
Consensus-Based Core Set of Outcome Measures for Clinical Motor Rehabilitation After Stroke—A Delphi Study

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-8069-9450
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid41aa2eb9-5e33-44f4-bffd-9aa4ede42580
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorPohl, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorHeld, Jeremia Philipp Oskar
dc.contributor.authorVerheyden, Geert
dc.contributor.authorAlt Murphy, Margit
dc.contributor.authorEngelter, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorFlöel, Agnes
dc.contributor.authorKeller, Thierry
dc.contributor.authorKwakkel, Gert
dc.contributor.authorNef, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorWard, Nick
dc.contributor.authorLuft, Andreas Rüdiger
dc.contributor.authorVeerbeek, Janne Marieke
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-02T16:24:14Z
dc.date.available2024-09-02T16:24:14Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-02
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Outcome measures are key to tailor rehabilitation goals to the stroke patient's individual needs and to monitor poststroke recovery. The large number of available outcome measures leads to high variability in clinical use. Currently, an internationally agreed core set of motor outcome measures for clinical application is lacking. Therefore, the goal was to develop such a set to serve as a quality standard in clinical motor rehabilitation poststroke. Methods: Outcome measures for the upper and lower extremities, and activities of daily living (ADL)/stroke-specific outcomes were identified and presented to stroke rehabilitation experts in an electronic Delphi study. In round 1, clinical feasibility and relevance of the outcome measures were rated on a 7-point Likert scale. In round 2, those rated at least as “relevant” and “feasible” were ranked within the body functions, activities, and participation domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Furthermore, measurement time points poststroke were indicated. In round 3, answers were reviewed in reference to overall results to reach final consensus. Results: In total, 119 outcome measures were presented to 33 experts from 18 countries. The recommended core set includes the Fugl–Meyer Motor Assessment and Action Research Arm Test for the upper extremity section; the Fugl–Meyer Motor Assessment, 10-m Walk Test, Timed-Up-and-Go, and Berg Balance Scale for the lower extremity section; and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and Barthel Index or Functional Independence Measure for the ADL/stroke-specific section. The Stroke Impact Scale was recommended spanning all ICF domains. Recommended measurement time points are days 2 ± 1 and 7; weeks 2, 4, and 12; 6 months poststroke and every following 6th month. Discussion and Conclusion: Agreement was found upon a set of nine outcome measures for application in clinical motor rehabilitation poststroke, with seven measurement time points following the stages of poststroke recovery. This core set was specifically developed for clinical practice and distinguishes itself from initiatives for stroke rehabilitation research. The next challenge is to implement this clinical core set across the full stroke care continuum with the aim to improve the transparency, comparability, and quality of stroke rehabilitation at a regional, national, and international level.
dc.description.numberOfPages9
dc.description.sponsorshipARTORG Center - Gerontechnology and Rehabilitation
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.147790
dc.identifier.pmid33013624
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.3389/fneur.2020.00875
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/37811
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFrontiers Media S.A.
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in neurology
dc.relation.issn1664-2295
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C49BE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.urlhttps://boris.unibe.ch/163163
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleConsensus-Based Core Set of Outcome Measures for Clinical Motor Rehabilitation After Stroke—A Delphi Study
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue875
oaire.citation.startPage875
oaire.citation.volume11
oairecerif.author.affiliationARTORG Center - Gerontechnology and Rehabilitation
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2021-12-21 16:14:31
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId147790
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
fneur-11-00875.pdf
Size:
4.8 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Content:
published

Collections