Publication:
Repair bond strength of resin composite to restorative materials after short- and long-term storage.

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0001-9390-5412
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid065b4bf8-a2eb-4079-adf0-88d19fb2efcc
dc.contributor.authorFlury, Simon
dc.contributor.authorDulla, Fabrice A
dc.contributor.authorPeutzfeldt, Anne
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-28T16:54:48Z
dc.date.available2024-10-28T16:54:48Z
dc.date.issued2019-09
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES To investigate short- and long-term bond strength ("repair bond strength"; RBS) of a resin composite to six restorative materials using either a silane and a bonding agent or a universal "one-step self-etch" adhesive system. METHODS Specimens were produced from an amalgam, a direct resin composite, two indirect resin composites, a hybrid ceramic, and a feldspar ceramic and stored for 3 months in tap water (37 °C). All specimens were then sandblasted (AlO; 25 μm) and either treated with Monobond Plus and OptiBond FL Adhesive (MP-OFL) or with Scotchbond Universal (SBU). Filtek Z250 was used as "repair composite", and RBS was measured by means of a micro shear bond strength test after 24 h or after 1 year. RBS values (n = 15/group) were statistically analyzed (α = 0.05). RESULTS RBS (MPa; mean values (standard deviations)) after 24 h for MP-OFL: 18.6 (3.2)-23.9 (5.0) and for SBU: 12.5 (4.9)-18.1 (4.6); after 1 year for MP-OFL: 8.9 (4.6)-19.8 (4.3) and for SBU: 5.6 (2.3)-18.8 (3.5). After 24 h, MP-OFL showed significantly higher RBS to the hybrid ceramic and the feldspar ceramic than did SBU (p ≤ 0.0001) whereas there was no significant difference in RBS for the other four restorative materials. After 1 year, MP-OFL showed significantly higher RBS to the feldspar ceramic than did SBU (p = 0.043) whereas there was no significant difference in RBS for the other five restorative materials. SIGNIFICANCE The use of a silane and a bonding agent seems more versatile for repairing restorations than the use of a universal "one-step self-etch" adhesive system.
dc.description.numberOfPages9
dc.description.sponsorshipZahnmedizinische Kliniken, Klinik für Zahnerhaltung, Präventiv- und Kinderzahnmedizin
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.131257
dc.identifier.pmid31146960
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1016/j.dental.2019.05.008
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/180753
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofDental materials
dc.relation.issn0109-5641
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C67DE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BE8FE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subjectAdhesion Amalgam Artificial aging Ceramic Resin composite
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleRepair bond strength of resin composite to restorative materials after short- and long-term storage.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.endPage1213
oaire.citation.issue9
oaire.citation.startPage1205
oaire.citation.volume35
oairecerif.author.affiliationZahnmedizinische Kliniken, Klinik für Zahnerhaltung, Präventiv- und Kinderzahnmedizin
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2019-10-24 23:04:19
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId131257
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleDENT MATER
unibe.refereedTRUE
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Flury_et_al_2019
Size:
2.91 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
publisher
Content:
published

Collections