Publication:
Two species? - Limits of the species concepts in the pygmy grasshoppers of the Tetrix bipunctata complex (Orthoptera, Tetrigidae)

cris.virtualsource.author-orcide638bf41-1c05-44e5-ae55-48926f5ce0e1
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorMoser, Valentin
dc.contributor.authorBaur, Hannes
dc.contributor.authorLehmann, Arne W.
dc.contributor.authorLehmann, Gerlind U. C.
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-09T16:52:18Z
dc.date.available2024-10-09T16:52:18Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-11
dc.description.abstractToday, integrative taxonomy is often considered the gold standard when it comes to species recognition and delimitation. Using the Tetrix bipunctata complex, we here present a case where even integrative taxonomy may reach its limits. The Tetrix bipunctata complex consists of two morphs, bipunctata and kraussi, which are easily distinguished by a single character, the length of the hind wing. Both morphs are widely distributed in Europe and reported to occur over a large area in sympatry, where they occasionally may live also in syntopy. The pattern has led to disparate classifications, as on the one extreme, the morphs were treated merely as forms or subspecies of a single species, on the other, as separate species. For this paper, we re-visited the morphology by using multivariate ratio analysis (MRA) of 17 distance measurements, checked the distributional data based on verified specimens and examined micro-habitat use. We were able to confirm that hind wing length is, indeed, the only morphological difference between bipunctata and kraussi. We were also able to exclude a mere allometric scaling. The morphs are, furthermore, largely sympatrically distributed, with syntopy occurring regularly. However, a microhabitat niche difference can be observed. Ecological measurements in a shared habitat confirm that kraussi prefers a drier and hotter microhabitat, which possibly also explains the generally lower altitudinal distribution. Based on these results, we can exclude classification as subspecies, but the taxonomic classification as species remains unclear. Even with different approaches to classify the Tetrix bipunctata complex, this case is, therefore, not settled. We recommend continuing to record kraussi and bipunctata separately.
dc.description.numberOfPages27
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitut für Ökologie und Evolution (IEE)
dc.identifier.doi10.48350/165603
dc.identifier.pmid34163294
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.3897/zookeys.1043.68316
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/67511
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPensoft Publishers
dc.relation.ispartofZookeys
dc.relation.issn1313-2989
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C150E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C18BE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subjectMRA
dc.subjectmultivariate ratio analysis
dc.subject.ddc500 - Science::570 - Life sciences; biology
dc.subject.ddc500 - Science
dc.titleTwo species? - Limits of the species concepts in the pygmy grasshoppers of the Tetrix bipunctata complex (Orthoptera, Tetrigidae)
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.endPage59
oaire.citation.startPage33
oaire.citation.volume1043
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Ökologie und Evolution (IEE)
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2022-03-09 13:11:19
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId165603
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleZOOKEYS
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Moser_et_al._-_2021_-_Two_species___Limits_of_the_species_concepts_in_t.pdf
Size:
4.75 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Content:
published

Collections