Publication:
One and one makes three-mothers' and fathers' attachment, mentalizing and parenting sensitivity.

datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorIsmair, Selina
dc.contributor.authorDinzinger, Antonia
dc.contributor.authorMarkova, Gabriela
dc.contributor.authorSchropp, Jonas
dc.contributor.authorBrisch, Karl Heinz
dc.contributor.authorSperl, Wolfgang
dc.contributor.authorPriewasser, Beate
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-30T13:25:21Z
dc.date.available2025-07-30T13:25:21Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractObjective This study aims to explore how maternal and paternal attachment representations and their reflective functioning (RF), as operationalization of their mentalizing abilities, influence each other's parental sensitivity within a family systems perspective.Background Parental sensitivity is crucial for a child's development, and both parental secure attachment and RF are known to enhance sensitive caregiving. However, the impact of one parent's traits and skills on the other's parenting remains unclear.Method In a longitudinal, multi-method study of N = 40 first-time families, including 40 fathers, mothers and their infants each, we assessed parental attachment during pregnancy using the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI). RF was measured twice, as general RF during pregnancy using the RF scale on the AAI, and as parental RF when infants were 6 months using the RF scale on the Parent Development Interview. Additionally, parental sensitivity was observed using the Emotional Availability Scales. To investigate associations between parental measures, we employed an actor-partner interdependence model.Results We found significant associations between attachment representations and general RF in both mothers and fathers, as well as a mediating effect of fathers' parental RF on the relationship between mothers' general RF and paternal sensitivity. Neither fathers' general RF nor parental RF did influence maternal sensitivity.Conclusion The findings suggest interdependencies between mothers' and fathers' reflective functioning and sensitivity, supporting family systems theory. However, given limitations such as a small, homogeneous sample and lack of causal inference, these results should be interpreted cautiously. Yet, the results may have important implications for practice, in that they suggest that both parent's attachment representations and the ability to mentalize in the triadic system should be considered in family interventions.
dc.description.sponsorshipClinic of Visceral Surgery and Medicine
dc.identifier.doi10.48620/90457
dc.identifier.pmid40718554
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1582698
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/213998
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFrontiers Media
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Psychology
dc.relation.issn1664-1078
dc.subjectactor-partner interdependence model
dc.subjectattachment
dc.subjectattachment representations
dc.subjectcaregiving
dc.subjectfamily system
dc.subjectmentalizing
dc.subjectmother and father bidirectional influences
dc.subjectparenting sensitivity
dc.titleOne and one makes three-mothers' and fathers' attachment, mentalizing and parenting sensitivity.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.startPage1582698
oaire.citation.volume16
oairecerif.author.affiliationClinic of Visceral Surgery and Medicine
unibe.contributor.rolecorresponding author
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
fpsyg-1-1582698.pdf
Size:
459.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Content:
published

Collections