Publication:
Evaluation of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with a simulated difficult airway: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0003-0160-2073
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid07bf9ea1-8ad5-485d-a1a1-bad09dfb5e7e
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid3e5f9518-08b5-4b2c-8b0f-3b03d7aad0bb
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid026b32d7-9fe9-48f0-9cbf-8b0d2138bef6
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid58a5f25a-95b8-4367-9219-cb7fdf2fc922
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorKleine-Brüggeney, Maren
dc.contributor.authorGreif, Robert
dc.contributor.authorSchoettker, P
dc.contributor.authorSavoldelli, G L
dc.contributor.authorNabecker, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorTheiler, Lorenz
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-24T19:07:30Z
dc.date.available2024-10-24T19:07:30Z
dc.date.issued2016-05
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Videolaryngoscopes are aggressively marketed, but independent evaluation in difficult airways is scarce. This multicentre, prospective randomized controlled trial evaluates six videolaryngoscopes in patients with a simulated difficult airway. METHODS With ethics committee approval and written informed consent, 12 senior anaesthetists intubated the trachea of 720 patients. A cervical collar limited mouth opening and neck movement, making intubation difficult. We evaluated three unchannelled (C-MAC™ D-blade, GlideScope™, and McGrath™) and three channelled videolaryngoscopes (Airtraq™, A.P. Advance™ difficult airway blade, and KingVision™). The primary outcome was first-attempt intubation success rate. Secondary outcomes included overall success rate, laryngeal view, intubation times, and side-effects. The primary hypothesis for every videolaryngoscope was that the 95% confidence interval of first-attempt success rate is ≥90%. RESULTS Mouth opening was decreased from 46 (sd 7) to 23 (3) mm with the cervical collar. First-attempt success rates were 98% (McGrath™), 95% (C-MAC™ D-blade), 87% (KingVision™), 85% (GlideScope™ and Airtraq™), and 37% (A.P. Advance™, P<0.01). The 95% confidence interval of first-attempt success rate was >90% only for the McGrath™. Overall success, laryngeal view, and intubation times differed significantly between videolaryngoscopes (all P<0.01). Side-effects were minor. CONCLUSIONS This trial revealed differences in the performance of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with restricted neck movement and limited mouth opening. In this setting, first-attempt success rates were 85-98%, except for the A.P. Advance™ difficult airway blade. Highest success and lowest tissue trauma rates were achieved by the McGrath™ and C-MAC™ D-blade, highlighting the importance of the videolaryngoscope blade design. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: identifier NCT01692535.
dc.description.numberOfPages10
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Schmerztherapie
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.93958
dc.identifier.pmid27106971
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1093/bja/aew058
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/148766
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.ispartofBritish journal of anaesthesia
dc.relation.issn0007-0912
dc.relation.organizationClinic and Policlinic for Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy
dc.subjectanaesthetic techniques
dc.subjectlaryngoscopy; equipment
dc.subjectairway; intubation
dc.subjecttracheal tube
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleEvaluation of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with a simulated difficult airway: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.endPage679
oaire.citation.issue5
oaire.citation.startPage670
oaire.citation.volume116
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Schmerztherapie
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Schmerztherapie
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Schmerztherapie
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Schmerztherapie
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.embargoChanged2019-06-01 00:30:12
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId93958
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleBRIT J ANAESTH
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
aew058.pdf
Size:
266.22 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
publisher
Content:
published

Collections