Endovascular repair of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms with inner and outer off-the shelf-multibranched endografts. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Options
BORIS DOI
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
39147287
Description
BACKGROUND
During the last years a great progress has been noted in device technology and operator experience in treating complex aortic aneurysms. Fenestrated and branched custom-made devices require detailed preoperative planning and production time that can take up to 12 weeks. During this awaiting period, the aortic related mortality is being increased. To overcome this limitation, off-the shelf standardized multibranched devices were launched in the market for the treatment of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA). Our aim was to systematically evaluate all the published studies of off-the shelf endografts for the treatment of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review to identify all the eligible studies that reported outcomes to the off-the-shelf with inner or outer multibranched devices and then conducted a qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis of the results. The main outcomes were technical success, mortality, target visceral vessel (TVV) instability, major adverse events and reintervention rate. We estimated pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
A total of 1605 study titles were identified by the initial search strategy, of which 13 (8=t-Branch/ 3=E-nside/1=We-Flow/1=TAMBE) were considered eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A total of 595 patients (70% male) were identified among the eligible studies. In terms of procedures, 64.4% were elective, 19.2% (13.4% outer-multibranched group (OMG); 6.1% inner-multibranched group (IMG) were emergent, and 16.4% (15.6% OMG; 0.8% IMG) were urgent. The pooled technical success was 92.1% (95%, CI, 83.8-96.4%) and 96.9% (95%, CI, 92.5-98.8%) for the outer- and inner-multibranched endograft, respectively. The pooled 30-day mortality was 10.4 % (95%, CI, 6.6-16.1%,) and 4.2% (95%, CI, 2.0-8.6%) for the outer and inner branched group respectively. The pooled 30-day and late TVV instability for the outer-branched group was 3.5% (95%, CI, 2.0-6.1%) and 6.2% (95%, CI, 4.7-8.0%) and for the inner branched group 10.4% (95%, CI, 4.5-22.5%) and 1.6% (95%, CI, 0.7-3.3%) respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
This pooled analysis indicated good technical success and mortality rate, for both devices despite the high rate of urgent procedures. Pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms can be safely treated using the included devices. However, further studies are required to draw additional conclusions for the inner group due to the small sample size.
During the last years a great progress has been noted in device technology and operator experience in treating complex aortic aneurysms. Fenestrated and branched custom-made devices require detailed preoperative planning and production time that can take up to 12 weeks. During this awaiting period, the aortic related mortality is being increased. To overcome this limitation, off-the shelf standardized multibranched devices were launched in the market for the treatment of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA). Our aim was to systematically evaluate all the published studies of off-the shelf endografts for the treatment of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review to identify all the eligible studies that reported outcomes to the off-the-shelf with inner or outer multibranched devices and then conducted a qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis of the results. The main outcomes were technical success, mortality, target visceral vessel (TVV) instability, major adverse events and reintervention rate. We estimated pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
A total of 1605 study titles were identified by the initial search strategy, of which 13 (8=t-Branch/ 3=E-nside/1=We-Flow/1=TAMBE) were considered eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A total of 595 patients (70% male) were identified among the eligible studies. In terms of procedures, 64.4% were elective, 19.2% (13.4% outer-multibranched group (OMG); 6.1% inner-multibranched group (IMG) were emergent, and 16.4% (15.6% OMG; 0.8% IMG) were urgent. The pooled technical success was 92.1% (95%, CI, 83.8-96.4%) and 96.9% (95%, CI, 92.5-98.8%) for the outer- and inner-multibranched endograft, respectively. The pooled 30-day mortality was 10.4 % (95%, CI, 6.6-16.1%,) and 4.2% (95%, CI, 2.0-8.6%) for the outer and inner branched group respectively. The pooled 30-day and late TVV instability for the outer-branched group was 3.5% (95%, CI, 2.0-6.1%) and 6.2% (95%, CI, 4.7-8.0%) and for the inner branched group 10.4% (95%, CI, 4.5-22.5%) and 1.6% (95%, CI, 0.7-3.3%) respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
This pooled analysis indicated good technical success and mortality rate, for both devices despite the high rate of urgent procedures. Pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms can be safely treated using the included devices. However, further studies are required to draw additional conclusions for the inner group due to the small sample size.
Date of Publication
2025-01
Publication Type
Article
Keyword(s)
complex and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms inner branched juxtarenal off-the shelf outer pararenal suprarenal t-branch
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Additional Credits
Series
Journal of vascular surgery
Publisher
Elsevier
ISSN
1097-6809
Access(Rights)
embargo