Publication:
The drama of the grabbed commons: CSR as anti-politics machines and local responses

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0001-9111-9071
cris.virtualsource.author-orciddca4d9d5-d0ae-484b-8fc4-d5231ed94950
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidfbfc1406-eb08-44a5-a2fb-67e26e463779
dc.contributor.authorHaller, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorGerber, Jean-David
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-08T20:52:16Z
dc.date.available2025-01-08T20:52:16Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-24
dc.description.abstractIn the current debates on large-scale land acquisitions (LSLA), the promise of material benefits through integration in global markets, land titling, as well as accompanying compensation measures – in particular voluntary Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives – hides the fact that LSLA are not the win-win undertakings depicted by prevalent neoliberal development discourses. We use James Ferguson’s Anti-Politics Machine to critically interrogate the development discourses used to promote LSLA. LSLA are expected to lead to the conversion of some kinds of resources (land, water, biodiversity, wind…) into others (high-value crops, monetary resources or infrastructures…). While some commons disappear (pastures, forests, hunting grounds…) other are created through CSR measures (infrastructure, irrigation channels, special community funds, classrooms or dispensaries). This paper explores the nexus between LSLA, anti-politics and CSR. Focusing on the public and private actors involved in – or impacted by – LSLA, we recount the drama of the grabbed commons. Combining approaches of New Institutionalism and Political Ecology, we ask: how is the access to resources impacted by the dissolution of existing commons, recognizing that many dimensions of power operate in an investment project, including gender, migration background, social status, age and lineage? Do new commons created by LSLA compensate for the loss of old commons? If the new commons do not compensate for the loss of old commons, why are people not raising their voices to preserve them? Our empirical evidence from detailed case studies in Ghana, Malawi, Morocco, and Tanzania shows that, under the promise of development, a growing number of land users are deprived from access to commons; at the same time local to global elites are increasingly interested in assuring high returns of capital investment. Powerful discourses of development, women empowerment, wasteland productivity increase, etc. serving as anti-politics machines hide increased state control and asymmetric power relations.
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitut für Sozialanthropologie
dc.description.sponsorshipGeographisches Institut der Universität Bern (GIUB)
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/201025
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.conference4th Open Science Meeting of the Global Land Programme (GLP)
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C062E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BD45E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C062E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C199E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subject.ddc900 - History::910 - Geography & travel
dc.subject.ddc300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology
dc.titleThe drama of the grabbed commons: CSR as anti-politics machines and local responses
dc.typeconference_item
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferenceDate24.-26.04.2019
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceBern, Switzerland
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Sozialanthropologie
oairecerif.author.affiliationGeographisches Institut der Universität Bern (GIUB)
oairecerif.identifier.urlhttps://www.conftool.com/osm2019/index.php?page=browseSessions&form_session=27#paperID636
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.description.ispublishedunpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId141136
unibe.refereedFALSE
unibe.subtype.conferencespeech

Files

Collections