Publication:
Comparison of different methods for thin section EM analysis of Mycobacterium smegmatis

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0001-7725-5579
cris.virtualsource.author-orcide050e437-7048-4ed7-8f07-6eaad53734c2
datacite.rightsrestricted
dc.contributor.authorBleck, C K E
dc.contributor.authorMerz, A
dc.contributor.authorGutierrez, M G
dc.contributor.authorWalther, P
dc.contributor.authorDubochet, J
dc.contributor.authorZuber, Benoît
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, G
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-10T21:09:39Z
dc.date.available2024-10-10T21:09:39Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractBacteria are generally difficult specimens to prepare for conventional resin section electron microscopy and mycobacteria, with their thick and complex cell envelope layers being especially prone to artefacts. Here we made a systematic comparison of different methods for preparing Mycobacterium smegmatis for thin section electron microscopy analysis. These methods were: (1) conventional preparation by fixatives and epoxy resins at ambient temperature. (2) Tokuyasu cryo-section of chemically fixed bacteria. (3) rapid freezing followed by freeze substitution and embedding in epoxy resin at room temperature or (4) combined with Lowicryl HM20 embedding and ultraviolet (UV) polymerization at low temperature and (5) CEMOVIS, or cryo electron microscopy of vitreous sections. The best preservation of bacteria was obtained with the cryo electron microscopy of vitreous sections method, as expected, especially with respect to the preservation of the cell envelope and lipid bodies. By comparison with cryo electron microscopy of vitreous sections both the conventional and Tokuyasu methods produced different, undesirable artefacts. The two different types of freeze-substitution protocols showed variable preservation of the cell envelope but gave acceptable preservation of the cytoplasm, but not lipid bodies, and bacterial DNA. In conclusion although cryo electron microscopy of vitreous sections must be considered the 'gold standard' among sectioning methods for electron microscopy, because it avoids solvents and stains, the use of optimally prepared freeze substitution also offers some advantages for ultrastructural analysis of bacteria.
dc.description.numberOfPages16
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitut für Anatomie
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.4094
dc.identifier.isi000272659400004
dc.identifier.pmid20055916
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03299.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/74762
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.publisher.placeOxford
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of microscopy
dc.relation.issn0022-2720
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BCD7E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleComparison of different methods for thin section EM analysis of Mycobacterium smegmatis
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.endPage38
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage23
oaire.citation.volume237
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Anatomie
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId4094
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleJ MICROSC-OXFORD
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
j.1365-2818.2009.03299.x.pdf
Size:
1.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
publisher
Content:
published

Collections