Publication:
International patient preferences for physician attire: results from cross-sectional studies in four countries across three continents.

cris.virtualsource.author-orcid2fec1527-1be7-4f73-9e77-f91747983c22
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorHouchens, Nathan
dc.contributor.authorSaint, Sanjay
dc.contributor.authorPetrilli, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorKuhn, Latoya
dc.contributor.authorRatz, David
dc.contributor.authorDe Lott, Lindsey
dc.contributor.authorZollinger, Marc
dc.contributor.authorSax, Hugo Siegfried
dc.contributor.authorKamata, Kazuhiro
dc.contributor.authorKuriyama, Akira
dc.contributor.authorTokuda, Yasuharu
dc.contributor.authorFumagalli, Carlo
dc.contributor.authorVirgili, Gianni
dc.contributor.authorFumagalli, Stefano
dc.contributor.authorChopra, Vineet
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-11T17:19:36Z
dc.date.available2024-10-11T17:19:36Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-03
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE The patient-physician relationship impacts patients' experiences and health outcomes. Physician attire is a form of nonverbal communication that influences this relationship. Prior studies examining attire preferences suffered from heterogeneous measurement and limited context. We thus performed a multicentre, cross-sectional study using a standardised survey instrument to compare patient preferences for physician dress in international settings. SETTING 20 hospitals and healthcare practices in Italy, Japan, Switzerland and the USA. PARTICIPANTS Convenience sample of 9171 adult patients receiving care in academic hospitals, general medicine clinics, specialty clinics and ophthalmology practices. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES The survey was randomised and included photographs of a male or female physician dressed in assorted forms of attire. The primary outcome measure was attire preference, comprised of composite ratings across five domains: how knowledgeable, trustworthy, caring and approachable the physician appeared, and how comfortable the respondent felt. Secondary outcome measures included variation in preferences by country, physician type and respondent characteristics. RESULTS The highest rated forms of attire differed by country, although each most preferred attire with white coat. Low ratings were conferred on attire extremes (casual and business suit). Preferences were more uniform for certain physician types. For example, among all respondents, scrubs garnered the highest rating for emergency department physicians (44.2%) and surgeons (42.4%). However, attire preferences diverged for primary care and hospital physicians. All types of formal attire were more strongly preferred in the USA than elsewhere. Respondent age influenced preferences in Japan and the USA only. CONCLUSIONS Patients across a myriad of geographies, settings and demographics harbour specific preferences for physician attire. Some preferences are nearly universal, whereas others vary substantially. As a one-size-fits-all dress policy is unlikely to reflect patient desires and expectations, a tailored approach should be sought that attempts to match attire to clinical context.
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversitätsklinik für Infektiologie
dc.identifier.doi10.48350/173464
dc.identifier.pmid36192090
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061092
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/87852
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ open
dc.relation.issn2044-6055
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BB13E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subjectGENERAL MEDICINE (see Internal Medicine) Health policy Physician attire Protocols & guidelines clothing dress nonverbal communication patient preferences patient-physician relationship uniform
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleInternational patient preferences for physician attire: results from cross-sectional studies in four countries across three continents.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.issue10
oaire.citation.startPagee061092
oaire.citation.volume12
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Infektiologie
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2022-10-04 13:14:19
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId173464
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleBMJ Open
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
e061092.full.pdf
Size:
1.34 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Content:
published

Collections