• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. The Effect of Defect Morphology and Membrane Fixation on 3D Graft Material Displacement During Primary Wound Closure in Horizontal Bone Augmentation-An Ex Vivo Study.
 

The Effect of Defect Morphology and Membrane Fixation on 3D Graft Material Displacement During Primary Wound Closure in Horizontal Bone Augmentation-An Ex Vivo Study.

Options
  • Details
  • Files
BORIS DOI
10.48620/92305
Publisher DOI
10.1111/clr.70072
PubMed ID
41194314
Description
Objectives
This preclinical study evaluated the influence of two defect morphologies on graft material displacement (GMD) during primary wound closure in horizontal bone augmentation (HBA). Secondary aims included assessing the effect of membrane stabilization and the role of local soft tissue characteristics on GMD.Materials And Methods
Standardized HBA procedures following guided bone regeneration principles were performed on fresh pig hemimandibles. Each mandible received two sequential HBAs, randomized for defect morphology-partially contained (PCD) vs. contained (CD)-and membrane stabilization with (+Pins) or without (-Pins) four fixation pins. GMD was assessed using cone-beam computed tomography and intraoral scanning by comparing graft dimensions before and after wound closure, at nine levels from the implant platform and across nine delimited sections, respectively.Results
Sixty HBA procedures were analyzed. A notable GMD was observed for both PCD and CD, with no significant differences between them. In contrast, membrane stabilization significantly reduced three-dimensional GMD across all sections, with the most pronounced effect in the central-crestal section (p < 0.001). At the implant platform level, GMD was -15.8% ± 25.6% with pins vs. -38.1% ± 27.4% without pins (p < 0.001). Across all groups, GMD occurred in an apico-lateral direction, with the greatest volume loss in the central-crestal, mesial, and distal crestal sections. Soft tissue phenotype did not affect GMD (p ≥ 0.240).Conclusion
Defect morphology did not significantly influence the notable apico-lateral GMD. However, membrane stabilization using pins effectively reduced graft displacement, minimizing movement during primary wound closure.
Date of Publication
2026-03
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
Keyword(s)
alveolar ridge augmentation
•
bone substitutes
•
cone‐beam computed tomography
•
dental implants
•
grafts
•
guided bone regeneration
•
surgical flaps
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Raabe, Clemens
School of Dental Medicine
School of Dental Medicine, Clinic of Oral Surgery and Stomatology
Cafferata, Emilio A
Zhou, Wenjie
Lingwal, Neelam
Müller, Katharina M
Ramanauskaite, Ausra
Schwarz, Frank
Couso-Queiruga, Emilioorcid-logo
School of Dental Medicine, Clinic of Oral Surgery and Stomatology
Additional Credits
School of Dental Medicine, Clinic of Oral Surgery and Stomatology
School of Dental Medicine
Series
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Publisher
Wiley
ISSN
1600-0501
0905-7161
Access(Rights)
open.access
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: dd892c [ 9.04. 8:30]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo