Publication:
Citrate- vs. acetate-based dialysate in bicarbonate haemodialysis: consequences on haemodynamics, coagulation, acid-base status, and electrolytes

cris.virtualsource.author-orcid9db8494d-3c9f-47db-8f30-aa939035aef8
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorGabutti, Luca
dc.contributor.authorLucchini, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorMarone, Claudio
dc.contributor.authorAlberio, Lorenzo
dc.contributor.authorBurnier, Michel
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-14T07:37:51Z
dc.date.available2024-10-14T07:37:51Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: A concentrate for bicarbonate haemodialysis acidified with citrate instead of acetate has been marketed in recent years. The small amount of citrate used (one-fifth of the concentration adopted in regional anticoagulation) protects against intradialyser clotting while minimally affecting the calcium concentration. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of citrate- and acetate-based dialysates on systemic haemodynamics, coagulation, acid-base status, calcium balance and dialysis efficiency. METHODS: In 25 patients who underwent a total of 375 dialysis sessions, an acetate dialysate (A) was compared with a citrate dialysate with (C+) or without (C) calcium supplementation (0.25 mmol/L) in a randomised single-blind cross-over study. Systemic haemodynamics were evaluated using pulse-wave analysis. Coagulation, acid-base status, calcium balance and dialysis efficiency were assessed using standard biochemical markers. RESULTS: Patients receiving the citrate dialysate had significantly lower systolic blood pressure (BP) (-4.3 mmHg, p < 0.01) and peripheral resistances (PR) (-51 dyne.sec.cm-5, p < 0.001) while stroke volume was not increased. In hypertensive patients there was a substantial reduction in BP (-7.8 mmHg, p < 0.01). With the C+ dialysate the BP gap was less pronounced but the reduction in PR was even greater (-226 dyne.sec.cm-5, p < 0.001). Analyses of the fluctuations in PR and of subjective tolerance suggested improved haemodynamic stability with the citrate dialysate. Furthermore, an increase in pre-dialysis bicarbonate and a decrease in pre-dialysis BUN, post-dialysis phosphate and ionised calcium were noted. Systemic coagulation activation was not influenced by citrate. CONCLUSION: The positive impact on dialysis efficiency, acid-base status and haemodynamics, as well as the subjective tolerance, together indicate that citrate dialysate can significantly contribute to improving haemodialysis in selected patients.
dc.description.numberOfPages11
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversitätsklinik für Hämatologie und Hämatologisches Zentrallabor
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.30908
dc.identifier.isi000283019300001
dc.identifier.pmid19265544
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1186/1471-2369-10-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/104382
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.publisher.placeLondon
dc.relation.ispartofBMC nephrology
dc.relation.issn1471-2369
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C055E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.titleCitrate- vs. acetate-based dialysate in bicarbonate haemodialysis: consequences on haemodynamics, coagulation, acid-base status, and electrolytes
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.startPage7
oaire.citation.volume10
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Hämatologie und Hämatologisches Zentrallabor
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId30908
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleBMC NEPHROL
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
1471-2369-10-7.pdf
Size:
324 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Content:
published

Collections