Publication:
Can quantitative sensory tests predict failed back surgery?: A prospective cohort study.

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-9094-9476
cris.virtualsource.author-orcide337e9e4-7216-4bbb-a421-a812e0a21bfe
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid293ff41f-2638-4ba0-a342-626965287f31
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid6c371b73-f608-418e-b983-1dd22e241c0c
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidb15a0e90-f210-4e04-b1dc-e6c83a4baedf
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Monika
dc.contributor.authorLimacher, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorAgten, Christoph A
dc.contributor.authorTreichel, Fabienne
dc.contributor.authorHeini, Paul
dc.contributor.authorSeidel, Ulrich
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Ole K
dc.contributor.authorArendt-Nielsen, Lars
dc.contributor.authorJüni, Peter
dc.contributor.authorCuratolo, Michele
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-28T17:07:05Z
dc.date.available2024-10-28T17:07:05Z
dc.date.issued2019-09
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a pain condition refractory to therapy, and is characterised by persistent low back pain after spinal surgery. FBSS is associated with severe disability, low quality of life and high unemployment. We are currently unable to identify patients who are at risk of developing FBSS. Patients with chronic low back pain may display signs of central hypersensitivity as assessed by quantitative sensory tests (QST). This can contribute to the risk of developing persistent pain after surgery. OBJECTIVE We tested the hypothesis that central hypersensitivity as assessed by QST predicts FBSS. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Three tertiary care centres. PATIENTS 141 patients scheduled for up to three segment spinal surgery for chronic low back pain (defined as at least 3 on a numerical rating scale on most days during the week and with a minimum duration of 3 months) due to degenerative changes. OUTCOMES We defined FBSS as persistent pain, persistent disability or a composite outcome defined as either persistent pain or disability. The primary outcome was persistent pain 12 months after surgery. We applied 14 QST using electrical, pressure and temperature stimulation to predict FBSS and assessed the association of QST with FBSS in multivariable analyses adjusted for sociodemographic, psychological and clinical and surgery-related characteristics. RESULTS None of the investigated 14 QST predicted FBSS, with 95% confidence intervals of crude and adjusted associations of all QST including one as a measure of no association. Results remained robust in all sensitivity and secondary analyses. CONCLUSION The study indicates that assessment of altered central pain processing using current QST is unlikely to identify patients at risk of FBSS and is therefore unlikely to inform clinical decisions.
dc.description.numberOfPages10
dc.description.sponsorshipZentrum für Translationale Forschung der Universitätsklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
dc.description.sponsorshipClinical Trials Unit Bern (CTU)
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Schmerztherapie
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversitätsklinik für Orthopädische Chirurgie und Traumatologie
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.132359
dc.identifier.pmid31368907
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1097/EJA.0000000000001012
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/181482
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean journal of anaesthesiology
dc.relation.issn0265-0215
dc.relation.organization33BF865BF1D23C90E053960C5C8246BD
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BADCE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BADEE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BE42E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BECFE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.subject.ddc300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology::360 - Social problems & social services
dc.titleCan quantitative sensory tests predict failed back surgery?: A prospective cohort study.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.endPage704
oaire.citation.issue9
oaire.citation.startPage695
oaire.citation.volume36
oairecerif.author.affiliationZentrum für Translationale Forschung der Universitätsklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
oairecerif.author.affiliationClinical Trials Unit Bern (CTU)
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Schmerztherapie
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Orthopädische Chirurgie und Traumatologie
oairecerif.author.affiliation2Universitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Schmerztherapie
oairecerif.author.affiliation2Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.embargoChanged2019-11-04 01:30:35
unibe.date.licenseChanged2019-10-23 12:52:48
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId132359
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleEUR J ANAESTH
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Name:
Müller EurJAnaesthesiol 2019.pdf
Size:
288.92 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
publisher
Content:
published
Name:
Müller EurJAnaesthesiol 2019_postprint.pdf
Size:
365.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
publisher
Content:
accepted

Collections