Publication:
Systematic scoping review of automated systems for the surveillance of healthcare-associated bloodstream infections related to intravascular catheters.

cris.virtualsource.author-orcid54d6817c-e6ed-43c7-9864-83f3d1c85cf4
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorLotfinejad, Nasim
dc.contributor.authorJanuel, Jean-Marie
dc.contributor.authorTschudin-Sutter, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorSchreiber, Peter W
dc.contributor.authorGrandbastien, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorDamonti, Lauro
dc.contributor.authorLo Priore, Elia
dc.contributor.authorScherrer, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorHarbarth, Stephan
dc.contributor.authorCatho, Gaud
dc.contributor.authorBuetti, Niccolò
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-26T17:26:47Z
dc.date.available2024-10-26T17:26:47Z
dc.date.issued2024-02-28
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION Intravascular catheters are crucial devices in medical practice that increase the risk of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), and related health-economic adverse outcomes. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of published automated algorithms for surveillance of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). METHODS We performed a scoping review based on a systematic search of the literature in PubMed and EMBASE from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2021. Studies were included if they evaluated predictive performance of automated surveillance algorithms for CLABSI/CRBSI detection and used manually collected surveillance data as reference. We assessed the design of the automated systems, including the definitions used to develop algorithms (CLABSI versus CRBSI), the datasets and denominators used, and the algorithms evaluated in each of the studies. RESULTS We screened 586 studies based on title and abstract, and 99 were assessed based on full text. Nine studies were included in the scoping review. Most studies were monocentric (n = 5), and they identified CLABSI (n = 7) as an outcome. The majority of the studies used administrative and microbiological data (n = 9) and five studies included the presence of a vascular central line in their automated system. Six studies explained the denominator they selected, five of which chose central line-days. The most common rules and steps used in the algorithms were categorized as hospital-acquired rules, infection rules (infection versus contamination), deduplication, episode grouping, secondary BSI rules (secondary versus primary BSI), and catheter-associated rules. CONCLUSION The automated surveillance systems that we identified were heterogeneous in terms of definitions, datasets and denominators used, with a combination of rules in each algorithm. Further guidelines and studies are needed to develop and implement algorithms to detect CLABSI/CRBSI, with standardized definitions, appropriate data sources and suitable denominators.
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversitätsklinik für Infektiologie
dc.identifier.doi10.48350/193612
dc.identifier.pmid38419046
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1186/s13756-024-01380-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/175023
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relation.ispartofAntimicrobial resistance and infection control
dc.relation.issn2047-2994
dc.relation.organizationClinic of Infectiology
dc.subjectAlgorithm Automated monitoring Automation CLABSI CRBSI Healthcare associated infections Surveillance
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleSystematic scoping review of automated systems for the surveillance of healthcare-associated bloodstream infections related to intravascular catheters.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage25
oaire.citation.volume13
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Infektiologie
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2024-03-05 08:33:17
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId193612
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlereview

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
s13756-024-01380-x.pdf
Size:
1.13 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Content:
published

Collections