Publication:
Skeletal variation in bird domestication: limb proportions and sternum in chicken, with comparisons to mallard ducks and Muscovy ducks.

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0001-6289-5784
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0001-8185-3002
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid8a9e2017-8c40-4ba7-bd8f-8a7baa2ce913
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidb4c49ec2-8f05-4346-9d3f-6d1cf8c67994
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorHerrera-Castillo, Carlos Manuel
dc.contributor.authorGeiger, Madeleine
dc.contributor.authorNúñez-León, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorNagashima, Hiroshi
dc.contributor.authorGebhardt-Henrich, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorToscano, Michael Jeffrey
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Villagra, Marcelo R
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-09T17:36:24Z
dc.date.available2024-10-09T17:36:24Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-27
dc.description.abstractBackground Domestication, including selective breeding, can lead to morphological changes of biomechanical relevance. In birds, limb proportions and sternum characteristics are of great importance and have been studied in the past for their relation with flight, terrestrial locomotion and animal welfare. In this work we studied the effects of domestication and breed formation in limb proportions and sternum characteristics in chicken (Gallus gallus), mallard ducks (Anas plathyrhynchos) and Muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata). Methods First, we quantified the proportional length of three long bones of the forelimb (humerus, radius, and carpometacarpus) and the hind limb (femur, tibiotarsus, and tarsometatarsus) in domestic chickens, mallard ducks, and Muscovy ducks and their wild counterparts. For this, we took linear measurements of these bones and compared their proportions in the wild vs. the domestic group in each species. In chicken, these comparisons could also be conducted among different breeds. We then evaluated the proportional differences in the context of static and ontogenetic allometry. Further, we compared discrete sternum characteristics in red jungle fowl and chicken breeds. In total, we examined limb bones of 287 specimens and keel bones of 63 specimens. Results We found a lack of significant change in the proportions of limb bones of chicken and Muscovy duck due to domestication, but significant differences in the case of mallard ducks. Variation of evolvability, allometric scaling, and heterochrony may serve to describe some of the patterns of change we report. Flight capacity loss in mallard ducks resulting from domestication may have a relation with the difference in limb proportions. The lack of variation in proportions that could distinguish domestic from wild forms of chicken and Muscovy ducks may reflect no selection for flight capacity during the domestication process in these groups. In chicken, some of the differences identified in the traits discussed are breed-dependent. The study of the sternum revealed that the condition of crooked keel was not unique to domestic chicken, that some sternal characteristics were more frequent in certain chicken breeds than in others, and that overall there were no keel characteristics that are unique for certain chicken breeds. Despite some similar morphological changes identified across species, this study highlights the lack of universal patterns in domestication and breed formation.
dc.description.sponsorshipVPH-Institut, Abteilung Tierschutz
dc.identifier.doi10.48350/169715
dc.identifier.pmid35502208
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.7717/peerj.13229
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/70537
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPeerJ, Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofPeerJ
dc.relation.issn2167-8359
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BEDEE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C05CE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subjectAllometry Anas plathyrhynchos Breed formation Cairina moschata Domestication Gallus gallus Limb proportions
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::630 - Agriculture
dc.titleSkeletal variation in bird domestication: limb proportions and sternum in chicken, with comparisons to mallard ducks and Muscovy ducks.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.issuee13229
oaire.citation.startPagee13229
oaire.citation.volume10
oairecerif.author.affiliationVPH-Institut, Abteilung Tierschutz
oairecerif.author.affiliationVPH-Institut, Abteilung Tierschutz
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2022-05-04 07:43:22
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId169715
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
peerj-13229.pdf
Size:
7.16 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Content:
published

Collections